But the
I think his point is that fingerprint and DNA false positives dont lead to a suspect that looks like what a witness saw. Whereas facial regonition false positives almost guarantee that the person will at least look similar to what the witness saw. Thus for facial recognition, the witness-as-a-confirmation is not as compelling. It's almost the same piece of evidence, rather than two corroborating pieces.
Don't you remember? It was right there in the article.
The Swedish Chef has started a new crypto currency.
I always thought it had something to do with the Swedish Chef.
I wonder what his viewing history would be like.
They have been doing it for years: http://lifehacker.com/5849589/...
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.