It also was not designed to display images, or replace Gopher, or become one of the major foundations of the modern economy.

Funny how things work out, isn’t it?

Well, the analog over the air signal was phased out already. OTA should be digital now.

Unless you’re served by LPTV stations, for which there is still no mandated analog sunset:

The June 12, 2009 DTV transition deadline does not apply to low-power television stations. The FCC will determine a deadline for these stations to transition to digital at a future date.

Personally, I’m still receiving analog OTA TV near Havre, Montana from four American broadcasters and two Canadian ones. The American stations, being translators, identify as digital, but they are analog. I can’t get any digital OTA TV out here.

There’s also a special filing system for those documents, one that gets emptied automatically at the end of the day. I believe you techies call it “garbage collection.”

Cars work with today's gas and roads.

No, not if they need leaded gas.

Old televisions work with today's services and electricity.

Not in the US they don’t, unless some old TV maker had a time machine and access to ATSC hardware, or if your definition of an ‘old’ TV includes TVs recent enough to be cable-ready and you have an analog cable hookup.

Yes, recompiling and recoding works - but why does Linux always have to rely on that, and other systems less so, having better binary compatibility?

I can run 32-bit binaries on my 64-bit system just fine. I just need the right libraries, just like with all of the other software I run. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

What if hundreds of thousands or even millions of westerners drew and posted online depictions of the prophet Mohammed? Would that finally make the point that secular cultures are not bound by religious law and enjoy the freedom to ignore dogma as desired?

No, it would convince them (the morons protesting South Park, the morons who rioted over the Danish cartoons, and similar people) that all Christians hate Islam and the Prophet and therefore want to kill them. They are convinced that we would be just as angry as they are if someone made really offensive pictures of Jesus. They do not understand our way of life.

I think a better plan might be to give them those offensive pictures of Jesus. Make a million images of Jesus being humiliated, urinate on a few thousand crucifixes, and maybe then they will begin to understand that we are not like them when it comes to religion.

Of course, then we might have to work on the fact a large number of us have no religion at all. That might take a while.

The fittest survive.
What is meant by the fittest?

The ones whose children have the most viable children, where ‘viable’ means ‘healthy and able to reproduce.’

That is not a quote from Darwin, by the way, but it sums up one small aspect of his whole theory. Where some people who do not understand it go wrong, however, is ascribing a moral dimension to all this. Nature is not moral.

When the shit hits the fan, how are you going to power your radio? How are you going to fuel that generator? And if the infrastructure to do those things exists, how long is it going to be before cell coverage is re-established?

You get to talk without infrastructure

But with a large amount of more-or-less direct Federal government oversight. To quote the artist, the FCC won’t let you be: As long as you are using the “public airwaves”, you are subject to laws that would not pass Constitutional muster in nearly any other space. You can’t even encrypt your communications to prevent ‘sensitive ears’ from hearing them.

Anyway, that’s what prevented me from pursuing a Ham license about fifteen years or so ago. I doubt very much has changed since.

There hasn't been a successful new systems programming language

Go is garbage-collected. That keeps it from being a systems programming language for a lot of people who actually use systems programming languages.

I’m not saying that’s ‘fair’ or ‘right’, it’s just the way it is.

(The difference with D is that in D, you can explicitly disable garbage collection for stretches of the code. A ‘Real Programmer’ would presumably disable it for the whole program.)

The enemies of Democracy [blackboxvoting.org] are

... what? Is this signature broken for everyone, or just for me?

I’m running Firefox 3.5 on Linux, for the record.

But the English language does, and it's in Oxford.

This is simply false. Nobody who has actually studied language could make this mistake.

If the gov stepped in and mandated more seats in medical schools, there would be more doctors and less of a shortage.

And a lower average quality of physician. The government can’t mandate skill or talent among its citizens.

Saying that Tibet must be either an aristocratic theocracy or an imperial possession seems like a horrible false dilemma. Would the theocracy necessarily be re-established in a new free Tibet? I doubt that, given that the world would be watching, and not just hippies: An oppressive theocracy so close to Central Asia would be an intolerable power shift.

Had Ron Paul won, the Office of the President would have become effectively powerless for four years. Read your Constitution and list the things a President can do if the House and the Senate are both dead-set against him.

I should probably clarify that I have no love or hate for Objectivism. I'm merely trying to get a cogent argument out of someone who obviously hates it.

Why? Because it should be amusing. Everyone who comments on it online, it seems, has an almost cartoonish hatred of the philosophy, its adherents, and Ayn Rand. However, it seems that most of them cannot separate those hatreds in a rational fashion, leading to purely ad hominem attacks against the philosophy. In short, it seems like they hate it because some of the adherents are assholes and Ayn Rand was really ugly.

So I'm happy I found someone who has an actual argument.