I initially posted to this story because people were claiming that Fox's right wing leanings were precisely what made them a bad news org. So yes, people obviously do feel that way. I didn't make that up.
Bias can affect objectivity but being bias is not the proof.
I am willing to accept evidence that Fox IS criminally or morally speaking distorting facts to suit their bias. I am willing to accept evidence that FOX is totally open and honest about its will and its right to lie to people about news.
People using this case as concrete proof of these allegations, is not only wrong, they are doing exactly what they are accusing Fox of doing. Distorting a story to fit their beliefs. The article I link to not only makes claims, it points to court documents and rulings to substantiate them. Evidence. If Fox in fact stated on the record that it used its 1st amendment right to distort facts to coerce these reporters, her wrongful termination would have never been overturned.
You claim I lied. I admit I lied. Judge throws out your claim that hinged upon whether or not I lied. Doesn't make any sense.
I would be interested to know if Fox was in fact distorting facts, and I will keep my eyes open as I always do, but can you link to an example of bias for me. Outright lie.