Comment insightful?? treadmill... Re:Bully! (Score 2) 292
So yeah, I'm a fan of the treadmill desk and recommend them.
Unless of course basic fitness smells too much of douchery for you, then never mind.
Allowing users to recover damages seems more suitable; a "zero day" class action suit or two would result in tremendous advances in best practices for security and qa (aspects of software development that, for some odd reason, just don't seem to get much funding today). By 'allowing' I mean changing software licensing so that verbiage like '...AS-IS WITHOUT RECOURSE TO RECOVER ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES, DIRECT OR INDIRECT...' no longer holds.
Which is a pretty huge change, and a number of interests would lobby against that. So I expect it will take a pretty severe incident (e.g. loss of life, or maybe a loss of significant money) to shock existing legislation and treaties (it would have to be global; hello WTO) sufficiently to encourage change. By "significant" I mean larger than the multi-billion dollar loss 'estimates of global damage from cybercrime' cited in TFA. That "cost" isn't nearly enough to change behavior, especially when you average it out across the world population.
The question boils down to the accumulating impacts of daily incremental pollution from burning coal or the small risk but catastrophic consequences of even one nuclear meltdown.
And at the end:
As a general clarification, ounce for ounce, coal ash released from a power plant delivers more radiation than nuclear waste shielded via water or dry cask storage.
The referenced article isn't the slam-dunk that its headline suggests. There are other more valid reasons to be pro-nuke than pro-coal. (Heck, there are valid reasons to be anti-coal even if you take nuclear-anything out of the equation.) The article doesn't add as much in the way of useful light as I had hoped it would; interesting, but not a compelling data point.
TFA is basically a "creative" type whining about her kind not being appreciated for their brilliance. For example:
A close friend of mine works for a tech startup. She is an intensely creative and intelligent person who falls on the risk-taker side of the spectrum. Though her company initially hired her for her problem-solving skills, she is regularly unable to fix actual problems because nobody will listen to her ideas.
Which makes me wonder,
1) "[R]egularly unable to fix..." ranges from "Never able to fix" to "Able to fix up to 49% of the problems." TFA smells like weasel phrasing here (e.g. spin) to emphasize the hand-wringing tragedy of (millions?) of poor ignored creative souls across the land laboring away in vain...
I would like to know what %ge of their solutions were adopted, and what %ge of those actually improved upon the original problem situation; e.g. what exactly is this 'intensely creative and intelligent person's actual track record ?
2) The 'close friend' works for a tech startup, and was hired for their problem solving skills.
Which means friend (aka 'anecdotal data point') has a job where they get paid to sit around and do (apparently) nothing?
Sounds like a squandered opportunity for all involved parties.
Which leads me to agree 100% with your conclusion:
If you have an idea about changing the way the company does things, the burden is on you to demonstrate the value of that change. If you can't, then the "creative" idea isn't worth much.
You make an excellent point. Reminds me of the experiments where a person was made to think they were executing someone in the name of science. While a part of me keeps saying the brainwashed are weak, I need to remember I'm probably not any stronger and am deluding myself to think otherwise.
RUGBY, N.D.—Wheat has long dominated the windswept farm fields of the northern Great Plains. But increasingly, farmers here are switching to corn, reflecting how climate change, advancements in biotechnology and high corn prices are pushing the nation's Corn Belt northward.
...
The shift, which is occurring in northern Minnesota and Canada's Manitoba province as well, shows how warming temperatures and hardier seeds are enabling farmers to grow corn in areas once deemed inhospitable to the crop."
And I would beg/buy/borrow/steal a modest SSD to run the OS on, you can probably get both for $100 or so. Keep your data sets on the slower spinning-rust drives.
If he's going to keep the data sets on the spindles then I see no reason at all to invest in a SSD. All calculation takes place in ram, it is loaded and written to spindles... Yeah the computer will boot in 15 seconds instead of 75, but how often is this thing going to be rebooted?
1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.