Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Title II (Score 1) 438

I've yet to have anyone explain clearly why having the internet under the same regulatory regime as the telephone system would be a, net, positive thing. Title II explicitly permits a lot of bad behavior. To me, it fixes one problem and introduces a few dozen others.

Wink.

Seemingly every law, movement, action, or drug comes with these side effects. I believe the skill associated with doling them out so they cause more good than harm is quite rare indeed.

It is conspicuously absent in the hands of a politician.

Comment Re:danger vs taste (Score 1) 630

In my experience, they ALL have a strong, nasty aftertaste. Even sucralose ("Splenda", e.g.) which people still flog as "almost actual sugar" has a bitterness that I can identify after one sip. Most of the time, I can even catch it if it's been used in cooking - I don't know if I'm just sensitive to it or what, but it's bad enough that I opted to learn to take my coffee without sweetener rather than add that junk.

I feel the same way about the city water: there's a chlorine taste/smell that even the RO system cannot remove.

I have gone the black coffee route myself, and now prefer it only that way.

I cannot, however, give up the coke in my whiskey... sacrilegious, right? I use some Diet, and actually prefer the Pepsi throwback non-HFCS blend.

There seem to be plausible arguments for health issues on both sides.. what are some decent alternatives to soda if one must have a mixer??

Comment Re:It is an ad. (Score 4, Insightful) 216

So Turkish nationalists are buying Google adwords. What's the problem with that? It's an exercise of free speech (for a position that I disagree with).

I have Armenian (and Greek) friends, so I know the basics. Armenians tell me about losing grandparents, aunts and uncles in 1915. This is of course the 100th anniversary. The personal tragedies are overwhelming, and if that wasn't enough, there is the further tragedy of destroying the Armenian and Greek communities and culture in Turkey, and the end of Ottoman tolerance.

I realize there's a debate over the word "genocide." The official Turkish position is, "Let the historians decide." I'm not sure what good that does them. The New York Times leans towards "genocide." http://www.nytimes.com/ref/tim... There is some symbolism here that I can't follow too well.

There is also a small, slowly growing movement among Turks to acknowledge the Armenian position. I don't know how long it will take. I'm not as optimistic as I used to be about world peace and reconciliation.

But Google isn't doing anything wrong.

Two takes from this:

Free speech, first and foremost, especially to the folks who disagree with me.

Eyes wide open, a very close second, get your important information from as many sources as possible.

Comment Re:Reason for not talking to people (Score 2) 95

Don't post online about current work-related stuff is probably good advice for all of us to take.

TFA was a bit sketchy on details, but it did seem to indicate her Facebooking had something to do with the mistrial, and eventual acquittal... whether or not this is factually accurate,

it's probably safe to say this was poor judgement on her part.

Comment Re:Higher diagnoses (Score 3, Interesting) 33

Elderly men with slow developing prostate cancer are frequently not treated because the disease is unlikely to kill them first.

Sadly, your medical care is incentivized in the same fashion as an automotive repair: the more repairs that are necessary, the greater the final invoice.

This is not to suggest there are not a great many ethical physicians, but we would be fools to overlook the likelihood that some sociopaths have slithered into the profession.

Comment Re:No, This Is Important for People to See (Score 1) 256

Well, I can't speak for the poster ... but I think you can reasonably conclude (and in fact should) that if someone comes out of the blue and claims to have a miracle cure for cancer, but no scientific evidence you should treat them with a degree of skepticism.

That absolutely nobody ever confirmed a diagnosis of cancer tells me this was a fraud which was committed with the willing complicity of the media, her publisher, and everybody else who utterly failed to do anything other than take her on face value.

Maybe everyone didn't "know" ... but people sure as shit should have been saying "OK, how credible is this claim". Because, really, reading the news stories about this ... there was absolutely no basis to deem her claims credible.

Just a media who wanted to show a story, and a bunch of people who lacked critical thinking skills who wanted to believe in miracles, or something which matched their existing world view.

When people make big claims about their magic healing cure which has no scientific evidence or study ... they should not be taken at face value.

Folks diagnosed with cancer are desperate people. Desperate people, sadly, just want to believe they can make every horrible boogeyman disease go away if they do the right thing, especially when receiving a grim outlook from conventional medical practitioners.

Fact checking, logic, and realistic thinking are displaced by the grasping of straws.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...