If you read the article linked, they're doing it with a cellphone camera too.

Not *great*, mind you, but possible. Thus kind of scary.

http://petapixel.com/2014/08/0...

Good lordy.

This would be really cool if the privacy implications weren't scary. However, I can't imagine this being useful or practical wide scale. As a targeted attack, that's really scary as fuck.

you can also tax too. Thus being able to spend with out creating debt.

Funny that, taxes. It's almost as if we spent the last 40 years being influenced by psychopaths who thought the worst thing in the world was the Government taking 10 percent.

Nice diagnosis doctor assface.

Check the research.

Basically, ADHD isn't being able to sit still for a long time, it's not being able to focus on things that aren't fun.

For most brains, being able to get through say, homework, isn't a problem. You just sit down, figure, it's going to take about 20 minutes to do all the math problems and you go play video games.

For someone with ADHD, the brain is constantly craving rewards. So video games, movies, etc. all basically jam a fork into the pleasure centers of the brain. So ADHD kids can sit still and enjoy the fuck out of it. When the gears shift, and into say work mode, there's nothing jamming against the pleasure center and the mind loses focus.

I've known about JTRIG, but I want more details. It's not enough to say JTRIG's a thing and that they've been trying. Have they been successful? Are they even relevant to this discussion?

Where's the beef?

Culture snooping of the 50's and 60's?

Yes, I'm aware of it.

But the sheer number of internet comments and flamewars really makes me think you're really off base here. Given the sheer size of that operation, there would have to be numerous agents handling all of the traffic on the internet. Someone would say something. Conspiracies of that size are really hard to hide.

I love the notion of troll types. Makes them seem SciFi/Fantasy somehow.

The behavior of Type 3 trolls is so vague that I don't think it's relevant. It's like when supplement companies say, "It promotes wellness." What the hell does that even *mean*? Who gets to decide what is and what isn't?

If you think the Government is harassing people with decent points on internet message boards, and that you've been painted as, "crazy"(your words, not mine)... Maybe you should reconsider things.

Joe Biden also drove a Caddy

That actually doesn't seem completely unreasonable, however, I think it's really petty to go after people who post goals to Vine, instagram, etc.

If I was a paid government shill, I wouldn't be taking public transport to work everyday. I'm hoping shilling for the federal government is big money.

You have a really far out concept of what trolling is.

You don't have a legitimate point. In context to the article, we're talking about people who have been posting grotesque pictures of sexual violence on Jezebel.com. It's also talking about people who are harassing Zelda Williams over her father's death.

So, I honestly have no goddamned idea what you're talking bout. So, citation needed.

Winning in an online argument because you're going up against a kook who doesn't even know they're a kook it isn't trolling. It's debating.

You're suggesting that the Government is funding assholes who post violent pornographic photos in comment threads about rape survival?

Who modded this up anyway?

EPL -might- be right. British law, particularly copyright law, is a little weird.

We're going to get a LOT of US Centric comments here, but I'm really hoping someone with an understanding of British law can help clear up this mess.

That doesn't work either.

There's no one size fits all approach to dealing with trolls. Some are best dealt with by ignoring, some by fighting, and some by feeding them until they explode.

int main() {
return 0;
}

exploit THAT.

HAHAHAHAH.

hipsters

Who are these magical hipsters the tech community seems to be obsessed with?