Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Bloatware?! (Score 1) 210

That fact that they need to put a multi page FAQ on their website to explain how to create a login account without a credit card number is telling enough.

You do understand that you don't have to make an account in order to use iTunes?

Comment Re:Consumers win (Score 1) 210

I thought we were talking about Suppliers shipping bloatware with their *products*... iTunes is REQUIRED if you use you iPod with a PC.

You thought wrong. It is a comparison between what is on an Apple computer when you pull it out of the box vs what is on a Windows computer (of various brands) when you pull it out of the box.

As has been stated previously, iTunes on Windows is an Apples to Oranges comparison. This is the same as complaining that in order to use a Zune on a Mac, you have to install additional software (albeit most likely a better experience than iTunes on Windows)

Comment Re:Consumers win (Score 1) 210

Yeah, you're right... They are completely incomparable! iTunes is 100000 times worse than anything that comes with Windows. Just having the iTunes/iPos service running (application closed) means your computer uses up about 75% of your available resources.

FFS, the comparison is between Apple supplied software on a new Apple computer vs 3rd party bloatware supplied on a new windows computer.

It is not about how bad Apple sucks at writing Windows software. And don't even start with the forced Safari install with iTunes on Windows.

Comment Re:Consumers win (Score 1) 210

Apple did a lazy port of iTunes to PC so that people could use their iPods. It sucked because they didn't put much effort into it. Possibly on purpose.

And it may still suck from what I have seen*. But kinda irrelevant to Apple not shipping bloatware on their own computers.

The sucking may be due to a lot of reasons such as Apple not having decent windows programmers, or trying to shoe-horn one set of source code into two different environments. I don't see them doing on purpose.

Comment Re:Bloatware?! (Score 1) 210

but I imagine they're even more into the sell more media side, as opposed to a simple and functional media player.

Like with Microsoft Windows, you can consider all the useless features they add to the system that are basically for marketing purposes, as bloatware.

Hardly a direct comparison. Apple has none of the the 3rd party crap pushed on windows that is free trials, upgrades or advertising.

My use of iTunes is to play local media, and free podcasts that I download (from the iTunes store). That is front and center for me and I am never pushed into buying media by Apples advertising dominating my user experience.

Comment Re:Bloatware?! (Score 1) 210

Too bad that fruit company has among its practice of bundling bloatware along its software users want to install.

What do you consider is Apple's bloatware? All I see are Apple written, basic applications that are complete in and amongst themselves. No free trials, no upgrades, no advertising.

Comment Re: DST (Score 1) 135

I wouldn't be complaining if that was the case, would I?

There are 4+ time zones in the US alone (*). Bounce around those a couple of times and you'll wonder why you thought DST was such a big deal.

* Depending on whether you count Puerto Rico, Guam or other US locations in addition to the 50 states.

Slashdot Top Deals

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts. -- Patrick Moynihan

Working...