I see a number of errors in your claim. Fukushima has the potential to be 25 to 30x radio-nucleotide release greater than Chernobyl.

1st item, the single Chernobyl reactor(Unit 4) while somewhat higher power output core, was ~1/2 of combined power rating of the melted Fukushima cores(unit's 1,2,3)

2nd) Chernobyl unit 4 was newly constructed, and it's core burntime was still in it's infancy.. (~2yrs), It may or may not have undergone it's first refueling swap-out (~1/3 of the core). Meanwhile Fukushima involved 30+ year old reactors(Unit's 1,2, and 3), with 3 fully mature cores, upwards of 5 years of burn-time per core near the start of the next refueling cycle (I.E. ~Worse case for radio-nucleotides) .

3rd, Fukushima is far from over. all indications point to a melt through below the plant, into an subterranean river flow, which will end up carrying the contents of those melted cores into the pacific ocean.

3rd) Iodine-131 is still being detected onsite. I.E. fission is still occurring, thus Fukushima is still of moving target. Note: At relatively low neutron flux levels indicate that the fission yield of I-131 will be maximized(~6x greater)

4th) Unlike fallout on land, where isotope mobility is somewhat limited, the Pacific ocean is far more efficient in respect towards bio-concentration of radio isotopes up the food chain.

Be prepared to write off the food chain for Northern Pacific ocean for the next hundred years or so. It's being subjected to equivalent fallout of ALL Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons ever detonated (worldwide 1945-1980) by just this one incident.

Microsoft's new forced update policy, increases the level of software monoculture. It's just a matter of time before some inventive hacker penetrates M$ security model, then it's all over.

The hacker will inevitability choose an exponential distribution model, where each newly infected machine becomes a host, and a sender. While M$ repair mechanism(update) remains stuck with a linear model. (relativity fixed number of update distribution machines).

Game over, M$ looses. Customers data is encrypted and held for ransom, if they are lucky. The end of Microsoft as a OS vendor.

I recommend that one stay's far, far, away from M$ new win 10 OS offering, unless you and your clients enjoy being part of a herd being lined up for slaughter.

Microsoft's new forced update policy, increases the level of software monoculture. It's just a matter of time before some inventive hacker penetrates M$ security model, then it's all over. The hacker will inevitability choose an exponential distribution model, where each newly infected machine becomes a host, and a sender. While M$ repair mechanism(update) remains stuck in a linear world. (relativity fixed number of update distribution machines). Game over, M$ looses. Customers data is encrypted and held for ransom if they are lucky. The end of Microsoft as a OS vendor. I recommend that one stay's far, far, away from M$ new OS offering, unless you and your clients enjoy being part of a herd being lined up for slaughter.

Correction, fraction of Sol's output to replace Humanities raw energy consumption should be 1.28e-4 (Not 1.02E-4).

huh?? Per your link, Earth receives 1.74E+17 watts from the sun.

Math time
1.74E+17 watts *365.24*24(hours in a year) == 1.21E+21 watt hours per year.
1.55E+17 Watt/hr/year(Humanity's Raw Energy Consumption) / 1.21E+21 Watt/hr/year (Sol's gift to earth) == 1.02E-4 .
You're still on the high side by a factor of ~25x

Percent wise harvesting 0.01% of the sun's solar flux would more than service humanity energy requirements. Reminder, for the most part, we waste ~85% of RAW energy content. I.E. deduct ~33% digging up/mining/transporting/refining/etc. Then another ~75% converting fossil chemical into thermal energy first, then into kinetic, then optionally electrical energy(then back to kinetic) before it does any useful work.

Even of that 15% we don't waste directly, how much of that is dedicated to manufacturing infrastructure for all those non-renewable energy industries and military assets to defend them? Let's say we knock off another 33%, Humanity get's 10% useful work from all of our current energy harvesting efforts, thus shift that 0.01% solar harvest number down another order of magnitude to 0.001% to replace that 10%.

I.E. Directly harvesting 1/10,000th of the Sol's bounty directed towards earth will free humanity of a lot bad habits, and it will set the world toward a much more peaceful path in to the future.

Same here, actually a number of my clients XP legacy apps have 16 bit installers, ergo no go Win 7 natively. These apps are installed in XPvirt boxes under Windows 7. I have no idea if Win 10 pro will support XPvirt boxes or if support for them will shortly disappear thereafter in some sort of forced update..

My advice to any business owner, would be to avoid this latest Win 10 release like the plague, they still don't have a stable build and it's less than 1 month before product release. I feel that using Win 10 is a high risk proposition at best, let someone else be the guinea pig.