I'm glad at least the company is claiming to "coach" their customers to use modern web browsers.

It's extremely irritating when companies fail to educate their clients and just take whatever money grab they can even when it's to support a project for IE6/7/8.

I guess I need to start having (gay) sex on my deck again.

"Originally the designers wanted to build just two incredibly tall towers, but height restrictions forced them to get creative."

So originally it was boring as hell. It's sad that "designers" have to be forced to be creative.

How am I supposed to know which one of the two buckets I fall into when I start agreeing with Republicans?

This two party system is so confusing sometimes.

Oh wow you need to have a 4 year degree in the respective program (law aside) you're applying to.

Impressive!

The white guy in the tie looks pretty cute...too bad he works for the FBI.

Then again I do like em cute and dumb.

I appreciate the clarification :) sadly I can't mod it up.

Was worried you were going to say that, it looks like all sorts of fucked up is coming our way.

I guess I was attempting to ask if they can blanket copyright the logic in an API so that you can't create an API similar to another API based on a high level description (although I'm probably getting patents confused here).

So from your nice explanation the implementation/logic is what is being copyrighted and not the purpose or "idea" behind the API itself.

What exactly is implied by a "copyrightable API"?

Does this mean that we can copyright an API in a broad generic manner? i.e. a "web service that returns a JSON object of apps in an app store".

Or is the specific manner in which the API fetches the information the part that is copyrightable?

It's going to be interesting to see how people react to the slowly encroaching restriction on what we can/cannot access online.

With the Middle East & Co. the cut-off was drastic, whereas I think in the West we're facing the Boiling Frog syndrome.

People in this thread are asking if the governments' are slow/inefficient, but really I think the general populace is even slower.

The only complaints that have any merit are the (mostly perceived) detriment to property value.

We've had them for years powering Bowling Green, OH and if anything they've been an attraction. http://www.bgohio.org/departments/utilities-department/wind-turbines

Do you have any scholarly references to subsonic vibrations causing health issues with wind turbines? I'd be interested in reading those because it sounds like psycho-FUD tbh.