Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents

Submission + - White House responds to software patent petition (whitehouse.gov)

Chapium writes: As part of the "We the People" series of petitions to provide feedback to the US government, the following petition was sent:

"... Under the patent office's current activity, patents have been come a way to stifle innovation and prevent competition rather than supporting innovation and competitive markets. They've become a tool of antitrust employed by large companies against small ones.

To return sanity to the software industry — one of the few industries still going strong in America — direct the patent office to cease issuing software patents and to void all previously issued software patents."

Here is the response.

Comment Re:Definetelly better than subsidizing obsolete te (Score 1) 272

Ah. A successful micro-investment, for sure, but I was referring more to the 500M (Solyandra) type investments. I was genuinely curious as to whether or not that level of investment pays off in smaller companies, or if our best bet with large amounts of the public treasury is to go with the proven larger companies.

Also, good job.

Comment Re:Definetelly better than subsidizing obsolete te (Score 1) 272

Genuinely curious here - is there any evidence that giving small companies that didn't have enough capital to participate themselves will actually produce results? In other words, has this kind of investment ever worked in the past? Can any specific examples be brought forth of small companies doing research on government payroll that reached breakthroughs that the larger companies did not?

Comment Re:About time, but... (Score 0) 386

Really? Different countries? Never knew that hurrrr... Seriously, go fuck yourself with that snarky bullshit. It's part of the reason I rarely bother with this fucking place anymore - the signal to snarky asshat noise ratio is far too low.

Anyway, ending the war in Iraq is a nice move, and it should have happened a long time ago, but means nothing if we're just going to scale up our war effort elsewhere. We will be taking our soldiers out of Iraq and deploying them at other 'trouble spots' around the globe. It's a shell game at best. We will never be without enemies and people who hate us, and the world will never be without douchebags who need a bullet to the head, but it is not our fucking business to go around dictating which ones are the douchebags that get the bullet. It's a problem for the region and a problem for the international community.

Afghanistan is scaling up when we should be getting out. The Taliban is more or less broken and Osama is dead. I'm sure there are plenty of other places in the world where horrible atrocities are committed all the time that we can go invade if you insist on being a neo-con about it.

Comment Re:totalitarian control (Score 1) 438

Advocating peace, low taxes, or economic responsibility on slashdot is seemingly always modded down. Apparently it's trolling and flamebait.

Apparently you have to simultaneously support big government and less government involvement in our personal lives, as if that will ever fucking happen.

I wonder if my sig will work...

Slashdot Top Deals

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...