Comment Re:So I guess (Score 3, Insightful) 43
That's not free software according to the FSF because it is BSD licensed rather than GPL.
That's not true. The BSD license is definitely present in the FSF's list of free software licenses.
That's not free software according to the FSF because it is BSD licensed rather than GPL.
That's not true. The BSD license is definitely present in the FSF's list of free software licenses.
Furthermore, Ubuntu proposed to use a "test-driven" development method. While such a decision is debatable, the Wayland project does not talk about its development method.
What's that supposed to mean? Have you ever tried going to the Wayland IRC channel (#wayland on freenode) and asking? Wayland is a project developed out in the open, but you make it sound like it's a secret how exactly Wayland development proceeds. It's not.
Everything else you say in your post is fair enough, but the point about Canonical not contributing to Wayland deserves more mention than it has been getting in these discussions. It's nice to want to use Wayland, but if their only problem with it was development not going fast enough, then implementing a new display server from scratch is the exact opposite of a solution, especially when none of the Mir developers have significant prior experience working on display servers. If they wanted to have a modern display server to happen faster, the easiest and most reasonable way to accomplish that - both for Canonical's needs and for everyone else's - would be to take an active role in the development of Wayland.
The companies you mentioned all have vastly more resources and technical expertise at their disposal than Canonical does.
But the main reason that his "NIH syndrome" criticism is valid is that in all of its recent defense of MIr, Canonical has not cited any other reason for not being satisfied with Wayland. Or at least not any other reason that wasn't later retracted for being based on blatantly false claims.
At least their actions can be explained by ignorance. Yours, on the other hand, is nothing but conscious misguided hatred.
That's not entirely true. If ignorance is the reason, it has to be paired with gross incompetence - they didn't bother to do their homework or even ask one of the developers about the capabilities and future direction of Wayland. Not to mention that it was beyond irresponsible to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the capabilities of Wayland without fact-checking in what they had to know would be widely disseminated. Now, even though they've retracted it all since literally every one of their claims was wrong, we have to deal with that false information being mistakenly claimed as fact in discussions like this one.
Try the first line of the summary: "You may recall from last week the news item concerning FunnyJunk's extortion
The meaning of that is "this is a continuation of a story that has been posted recently on Slashdot, and if you missed the earlier story, you might want to read up on it for context." That's why he included a link to the previous Slashdot post.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."