Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Anything but X (Score 1) 337

It might not directly answer the question asked, but it does solve the problem. The Wayland developers have made clear that no one expects X11 to disappear from Linux distributions in the foreseeable future. Since every toolkit on Linux already supports X, you can use the X backend of whatever toolkit when running the application remotely, and the Wayland backend otherwise.

Comment Re:This just proves it's NIH (Score 1) 337

Furthermore, Ubuntu proposed to use a "test-driven" development method. While such a decision is debatable, the Wayland project does not talk about its development method.

What's that supposed to mean? Have you ever tried going to the Wayland IRC channel (#wayland on freenode) and asking? Wayland is a project developed out in the open, but you make it sound like it's a secret how exactly Wayland development proceeds. It's not.

Everything else you say in your post is fair enough, but the point about Canonical not contributing to Wayland deserves more mention than it has been getting in these discussions. It's nice to want to use Wayland, but if their only problem with it was development not going fast enough, then implementing a new display server from scratch is the exact opposite of a solution, especially when none of the Mir developers have significant prior experience working on display servers. If they wanted to have a modern display server to happen faster, the easiest and most reasonable way to accomplish that - both for Canonical's needs and for everyone else's - would be to take an active role in the development of Wayland.

Comment Re:This just proves it's NIH (Score 1) 337

The companies you mentioned all have vastly more resources and technical expertise at their disposal than Canonical does.

But the main reason that his "NIH syndrome" criticism is valid is that in all of its recent defense of MIr, Canonical has not cited any other reason for not being satisfied with Wayland. Or at least not any other reason that wasn't later retracted for being based on blatantly false claims.

Comment Re:Not entirely the wrong choice though (Score 1) 337

Wayland actually [i]has[/i] gotten quite far, though. It's still not ready for widespread use, but there is a lot that goes into a display server, and most of that is in Wayland currently. Mir, on the other hand, is nowhere near that. Just look at the to-do list for Mir. Mir doesn't even have basic things like resizing windows or any form of window decorations yet.

Comment Re:This just proves it's NIH (Score 1) 337

At least their actions can be explained by ignorance. Yours, on the other hand, is nothing but conscious misguided hatred.

That's not entirely true. If ignorance is the reason, it has to be paired with gross incompetence - they didn't bother to do their homework or even ask one of the developers about the capabilities and future direction of Wayland. Not to mention that it was beyond irresponsible to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the capabilities of Wayland without fact-checking in what they had to know would be widely disseminated. Now, even though they've retracted it all since literally every one of their claims was wrong, we have to deal with that false information being mistakenly claimed as fact in discussions like this one.

Comment Re:So... (Score 1) 712

With one or two major exceptions, those third-party games are mostly indie games that had to port to Linux in the past to be part of a Humble Indie Bundle. His point stands - there's no guarantee that Steam for Linux will produce enough game sales for the major publishers to start porting their titles to Linux.

Comment Re:Please Help Me Through Demonstration (Score 1) 390

Try the first line of the summary: "You may recall from last week the news item concerning FunnyJunk's extortion ..."

The meaning of that is "this is a continuation of a story that has been posted recently on Slashdot, and if you missed the earlier story, you might want to read up on it for context." That's why he included a link to the previous Slashdot post.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...