Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Can we move away from guns already? (Score 1) 765

Did you bother reading this?

http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

7. Guns are used for self-defense often and effectively. “Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008,” says the report. The three million figure is probably high, “based on an extrapolation from a small number of responses taken from more than 19 national surveys.” But a much lower estimate of 108,000 also seems fishy, “because respondents were not asked specifically about defensive gun use.” Furthermore, “Studies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was “used” by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.”

Comment Re:Flawed reasoning (Score 1) 765

http://www.policeone.com/close...

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Topi...

I read that cops are more likely to be killed by their own guns than another's. But I can't seem to find the statistics right now. www.ncjrs.gov is not responding.

Just because you heard it does't make it true. And even if it were true (which it isn't), the majority of self inflicted gun shot wounds are due to accidental (or negligent) discharge, or suicide attempt, neither of which "smart gun" technology would have any effect on.

Comment Re: Flawed reasoning (Score 1) 765

Why would you want legislation that requires firearms to be less reliable?

There are already regulations to that effect. Your complaint on the "new" without even acknowledging the "old" indicates an anti-tech or anti-new bias, not a logical analysis of the situation.

Which regulation mandates a feature that makes firearms less reliable? LCI and mag disconnects? I acknowledge those, and think they are also bad law. Roster laws do nothing to enhance safety; that isn't their purpose, and it certainly isn't their result.

Am I anti-tech if I oppose legislatively mandated DRM?

Comment Re:The bigger picture (Score 1) 765

And there is a good deal of evidence that the rate of firearms being used for self defense are significantly under-reported as well. So what?

What is clear is that there is no statistical correlation (let alone provable causative link) between any weapons prohibition and violent crime reduction.

Comment Re:Camera gun (Score 1) 765

"[T]he activities [the Amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual's enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia." - SCOTUS, DC v Heller.

Comment Re: And any idiot with a soldering iron can bypas (Score 1) 765

So you are fine with being prevented from buying ANY firearm except this one?

Especially when the manufactures themselves state:

"The iP1 pistol is intended for target shooting only and will not function if it is not within 10" of the referenced iW1
wristwatch and the PIN code entered, or it or the referenced iW1 wristwatch do not have sufficient battery power, or
communication between them is blocked. It should not be relied upon for purposes of self-defense."

BTW, the question being answered here didn't ask about kill switches. Why are you moving the goal posts?

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...