As I mentioned earlier, 3-D is awsome for when you want ONE part for some old car, machine, airplane, etc. that no longer is supported. For making thousands of parts, not so much.....
Agreed, as long as the mechanical properties of the printed material are suitable for the part being replaced. For most metal parts, traditional machining is more economical. Trying to replicate traditional manufacturing processes is a dead end IMHO. These processes were optimized over the last 4000 years, at least since the bronze age.
OTOH, 3D printing is really interesting because it allows the creation of new types of structures such as hollow parts with complicated internal geometries. Such structures cannot be made (easily) by any traditional forming processes. - That's actually the direction where I think 3D printing could become the next big thing; ulltra-reliable machines that cannot be assembled or disassembled. Printing a 3D gun and assembling it out of discrete parts is dumb. To get this old crank really excited, somebody would have to print a working mechanical watch, right out of the printer.
....Or maybe structural plastic manufacturing....
Structural plastic developer here, three years of professional experience in this area. The problem from a purely structural standpoint is that 3d printing cannot print fibre-reinforced plastics. There has been some preliminary work on this at the Frauenhofer Institut in Stuttgart, Germany. http://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/ Their solution is running a nylon thread through the printer nozzle. For this, they have a spool of thread and a mechanism similar to a sewing machine on the printer head. This creates a part with a continuous thread that is oriented in the raster pattern traveled by the printer head. But the part does not have the characteristics of an injection-molded fibre-reinforced part, which would have many small fibers with many various orientations. I visited the site personally and saw their research first hand. They still have some technological problems to work out. For example, I don't think they understand shrinkage fully and would have a hard time complying with engineering tolerances. But for a quick prototype, more than adequate. Prototypes can be made to fit.
I won't go into material cost. Any industrial 3D printing outfit, that's halfway serious about what they do, would use raw granulate and not buy cartridges. But the main short coming of 3D printing as opposed to injection molding in a production environment is the cycle time. A complex part with tight tolerances (TG 3 after DIN 16742) of around 100-200 Gramms in an fibre-reinforced PA6 or PA12 can be injection molded in about two to three minutes, depending on injection temperature and cooling time in the mold, etc. The actual injection time is around one second for a reference. Otherwise material hardens during the injection process. The time required to print the same part would be many hours or even a day or more, depending on the printer used. I was at a 3D outfit and showed them a simple part of less than 10 Gramms. It would have taken in their estimation 30 minutes to print. Not good for mass production.
Where 3D printing is actually useful is generating rapid 3D prototypes or for doing custom parts in non-reinforced plastics. But custom parts, if they do wind up in the hands of a customer, aren't of good enough quality for my company to sell without hand-finishing to at least simulate the surface finish and texture of an injection-molded part. Acetone can be used here to make a smooth surface finish. Costs are high, but less than the cost of making a mold for a one-of-a-kind part. Alternatively custom parts can be made the old-fashioned way, that is by hand.
Usually the marketing people want the 3D parts more than the developers. Sometimes we use printed parts in development prototypes for parts where we haven't gotten around to making a prototype mold for. But these parts have limits, they usually cost a lot and if I need a high two digit or a three-digit-quantity, it's usually much cheaper to make a prototype mold. But sometimes it's difficult to convince management of that, which is probably a common problem. But after a couple of projects, the management's starting to come around to my point of view on this.
You know that the whole Pimp-my-X meme has jumped the shark when NASA scientists think that they need Tron style space suits and that they actually think they look modern and cool...
Proving once again that NASA hasn't quite gotten out of the '80s yet.
Let's litter.
If someone dropped a vintage Hasselblad camera in my back yard and left, I wouldn't be one to complain.
And we should trust this vote why?
Crimean Special Election Ballot (English Translation):
1. Mark Here_____ if you want to be an notionally 'independent' country that is in a slowly decaying orbit around mother Russia.
2. Mark Here_____ if you really really really want to join Russia now!!!
Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the commitments in the agreement are not relevant to Crimea because a 'coup' in Kiev has created 'a new state with which we have signed no binding agreements.'
Pay no attention to that signature on the dotted line.
It's almost as good as Putin's quote about "local security forces" buying Russian uniforms at any local military surplus store. So in order to protect law and order in my own country, I'm supposed to don the uniform of a foreign country? Now where did I put that old French Foreign Legion ensemble?
Financial system i have worked have never used floats. Its integers. Either just cents, or 10th of a cent. Or 2 integers for dollars and cents. There are rounding rules for this sort of thing.
Sounds like something out of Superman 3.
Tanks, er, ah... I got nuthin...
Tanks, but no tanks.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion