Any Idiot can right a RFC-Draft, they don't even have to know anything about networking.

A car is an portable electronic device. It may be powered by gas but that turns a generator which provides electricity. Many of the car components are electronic. Most cars are powered by a computer.

Also a speed limit sign is a bigger distraction than google glass ever could be and it requires you to take your eyes off the road to check to ensure that you are going the proper speed limit under penalty of law. Checking my speed got me in one accident when a driver in front came to a sudden stop far from a turn or intersection, and I was found at fault.

Distracted drivers will be distracted drivers even if you put blinders and ear muffs on them and lock their heads into position where they can only see the road.

1. Not every device needs a publicly routable address.
2. See 1.

The correct word is partner. The reason they have the five eyes )Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States) is so that they can work their ways around laws in one country by having another country do the spying then sharing the information back to the country that wanted the data to begin with. It's all about getting around the laws and as the article said "The bulletin notes only that the counsel’s office “provided clear guidance” and that the Australian agency “has been able to continue to cover the talks, providing highly useful intelligence for interested US customers.”"

That means that the information was provided to American intelligence agencies and that they are violating the clear prohibition against spying on Americans.

Then make the originating network legally and financially responsible for not filtering the spoofed packets originating from their network with a IDP (Internet Death Protocol) for any networks which do not fix their network within 3 days following a attack launched from their network.

Could be anything from insurrection, a terrorist attack, a plague, to a Christoph Dornier type manhunt. A hacker would certainly find it entertaining to disable their targets cell phones. remember the movie the Net, Enemy of the State, Swordfish, or a dozen others. The only person who should be able to disable a phone should be the owner of the phone, and law enforcement with the owners permission; or a court order identifying the specific phone to be disabled.

"What are “common law” rights?

Federal registration is not required to establish rights in a trademark. Common law rights arise from actual use of a mark and may allow the common law user to successfully challenge a registration or application. "

I have already sent in my email to their customer support letting them know if this happens I cancel my account.

What you thought he said, "We have never entered into any contract or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA's products, or introducing potential 'backdoors' into our products for anyone's use."

What he actually said "We did it for the money"

As has been defined by the FCC that makes anyone who provides access to the internet a "Telecommunications Service Provider" which would entitle them access to the poles.

"In Re Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Report to Congress 101 (April 10, 1998) ("With respect to the provision of pure transmission capacity to Internet service providers or Internet backbone providers, we have concluded that such provision is telecommunications.") "

I was wondering why GoDaddy hosting went to hell... And now we know. Mark this troll if you want, but you would only do so if you didn't actually try to host a web site with GoDaddy after the switch!

They don't pass it along to the NSA they pass it to the FBI who passes it to the NSA.... So while technically correct was a part of the big lie that the NSA is not spying on Americans...

Look if I buy something I have to pay 9.5% tax, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. these fraction of a percent taxes for stock transactions are total bullshit!

If that was the case then the NSA slides would not have listed both Google and Facebook as being onboard and partners in their PRISM system.