android (iphone is eating the dust of android phones)
google search (if you think that google was the first ever search engine, yahoo, altavista says hello to you)
facebook (myspace is still angry you know)
need more example of non-first runners winners?

Does anyone know what's the name of the company or who's behind it ? I have this feeling there must be some giant behind this new face.

australia, 1901, which incidentally is about 130 years after the US. comparing the britain of 1770 with that of 1900 is comparing apples to oranges. Plus australia is not totally independent, having the queen still as head of state and the british flag as part of its own.

ah...the force of reality distortion field is strong in this one.

Is this the first time in your life that you see a not 100% correct by the international standards change of regimes/borders (Kosovo comes to mind)? On the other hand I do like your Kuril argument. Let's extend it a bit more: "Finally, would the British Empire accept a referendum by residents of it's colonies in the new world, for example, on breaking away from motherland and becoming independent?" Those sorts of things are not achieved by throwing roses at your enemies.

stuff that matters? This is a trivial detail, and in due time all websites will list it under Russia.

we don't know we are made of matter. What if what we call matter is in fact anti-matter ? Or to put it differently, if the universe was made of "antimatter" wouldn't we think we were made of matter and the definition of antimatter (positron etc.) would be the opposite of what's now? Isn't it just a matter (no pun intended) of definition ?

the only one disconnected from the facts is you, as you a) lied about the numbers and 2) never provided any sources for your so called 50%. Until then you're just a shill without citations for his claims.

if that interpretation makes you feel better, so be it.

you're just an idiot. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... 60%. and no, putin is a dictator, but taking crimea back was the right thing to do. now go back to langley please.

it was russian before ussr even existed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... nice try. the choices seem pretty valid. the second one was "remain part of ukraine"

are you dumb or pretend to? where was the racism in my post? That piece of land legally belonged to Russia and was inhabited by Russian majority. A referendum took place (the right of self determination - remember that chump?) and they voted for independence.

I guess you are throwing the right of self determination out of the window dude. What sort of international law are you talking about? It's funny because in Kosovo, there was no referendum at all, it became independent just by bombing. The alaska thing is straw man, it was sold to the US.

There is no point in fighting for land that doesn't belong to you. Crimea was and is Russian (60% of the population is Russian and most of the rest are russian-friendly), nikita chruschtschow transferred it to ukraine in 1954 in a time that it didn't really matter because it was simply USSR land.

There is no point in fighting for land that doesn't belong to you. Crimea was and is Russian (60% of the population is Russian and most of the rest are russian-friendly), nikita chruschtschow transferred it to ukraine in 1954 in a time that it didn't really matter because it was simply USSR land.