ur mum's face make a nice specimen

i'm sure you find idiocy just as undeniably appealing.

you're an idiot.

providing factual evidence proving someone else wrong is flamebait?

you are all idiots.

slashdot = stagnated.

the difference between a "spammer" and a "real user" is a matter of opinion. both are controlled by real people, and both require a real user account to add forum content.

freedom of speech must be protected at any cost. "Random Digilante" is a terrorist.

i was comcast's subscriber.

you handle vengeance poorly, idiot. can't handle being told when you're wrong?

invent foobar system for non-object non-relational data organization
convert object data to foobar data
convert foobar data to relational data
fire lawyers.
profit

i have used comcast in 10 different states... almost exclusively in my recent travels. presently i use charter communications in wisconsin. in santa monica and santa barbara in 2009, i was told comcast no longer gave out @comcast email addresses because most people use free services like hotmail or gmail. i still have the bills. i never gave them a real personal email address. the only info they had on me was billing/service address.

last i checked, there is only one "comcast internet"... ur mum's face is a dumb ass.

the only acceptable heavy-handed solution would be to cut off their service until the problem is fixed.

comcast didn't give me an email address the last time i used their service... and at the time i didn't have a phone...

the obvious method of contact is a letter to the service address, but they send out so many junk mailings, most customers would probably trash them without reading. HTTP injection can not be tolerated... if you can show me their method for creating the overlay, i can reverse engineer a page that would be broken because of it. comcast can not be allowed to potentially break pages.

what did you think would happen when you signed your free artistic license away?

ur mum's face === troll

why are you scared of the truths i present? why do you refuse to offer facts, and instead suggest only prejudicial references to stereotypes?

is it because you're prejudicial?

you are NOTHING.

you're so stupid.

my point is that if such corporations existed that WERE granted such rights THEN THE CONTROLLING ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNMENTAL BODY WOULD BE COMMUNIST.

i can't believe how dumb you idiots are.

that's = that is => that = something exists. if that something exists, it's relevant.

they most certainly have the right to do whatever they want.

are you going to stop them?

you are NOTHING

the right of a non-state capitalist, for profit corporation to build structures on land where the land owners and local government have decreed they want no such structures?

that is COMMUNIST.

you're an idiot.

nope, you're still an idiot.