Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Each works for what he agreed... (Score 1) 785

If the senior guy is making what he agreed to, it should not be relevant what the other guy makes. Of course, being human, we care. A lot. But the solution is to talk to your employer, tell them you're interested in updating your skills to be of more value to them, and negotiate training/salary issues and MAKE YOURSELF MORE VALUABLE. Easier said than done, but that doesn't change whether it's what you really need to do.

Comment Re:Aww poor Assange has to deal with leakers. (Score 2) 237

Even a democratic government needs its secrets. Example: A Middle-Eastern leader doesn't think that Iran is a safe neighbor, but for reasons of domestic stability dares not say that publically, nor act against Iran itself. It describes Iran as a "snake" that needs to be beheaded to an American diplomat. Did this need to be made public? No. It helped no-one, and serves only to add to the region's instability. Someone in the State Department thinks the government of North Korea is unstable. Does this need to be made public for accountability? Again, no. It only serves to add to the problems with diplomacy in the region. Wikileaks isn't engaged in an assault on dangerous secrecy - it's engaged in an assault on American policy. Where are the Chinese leaks? The North Korean leaks? Oh, yeah. There aren't any.

Comment Rules are made to be made (Score 1) 491

You can absolutely have employees who are productive enough, and make substantial contribution enough that they get their own set of rules. I've seen those people, and I've *been* those people. However, you can't have employees that are so difficult to work with that they provide negative contribution to their coworkers' environment. In those cases, you need to either get them away from the coworkers, or get them away.

Comment Re:It makes sense for the business market (Score 1) 410

I dunno. If your users need to do all their work at the office, this could be great. You either always have connectivity, or nothing would have worked without the net being up anyway. Otherwise, you run into issues. Not only will this take some serious bandwidth, but if your net connection is down, you are out of luck. I'll be in the "thanks, but I LIKE using my computer even when the ISP is down" category. :)

Comment Can't install an ap? That'll slow adoption (Score 3, Insightful) 410

Really, not letting most users or applications modify the OS is a good thing. Microsoft (and others) have had a TERRIBLE model in permitting this. Third-party stuff has no business altering the foundation of the system's operation. Now, not letting an application that doesn't want to monkey with the OS get installed is probably going too far. I mean, who's gonna run an OS they can't put an app on? That's broken.

Comment Re:Double standards much? (Score 1) 703

Yeah, that would be because they're only pseudo-libertarians. They're actually much closer to anarchists in many respects. Amazon and Wikileaks may have had their issues, but these yahoos have made it into MY issue by stopping my holiday shopping at Amazon. Maybe in protect I should shut down their bank's website and ATM network right around your next payday? After all, you can always bank elsewhere.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...