Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:If this works, everything will change. (Score 3, Insightful) 132

This is consistent with the overall American trend of replacing solid blue-collar jobs with entry-level service type jobs.

I fail to see how trucker is a "solid blue-collar job" while "gas station refueler" is somehow an "entry-level service type job". They're both pretty typical blue collar jobs.

I would say adding a full-service attendant at every truck stop gas station is probably the least complicated and easiest-to-implement part of an automated nation-wide self-driving truck shipping system. You're really focusing on the simplest part of the problem.

Comment Re:In other news (Score 1) 609

It would settle the issue very quickly. What is the problem? That some investigator will see her talking about personal matters? What could possibly be that private?

Are you joking? Think about how heavily scrutinized her personal emails would be. Anyone running against her could take comments completely out of context and absolutely destroy her in attack ads.

Comment Re:In other news (Score 1) 609

Given that there are gaps of MONTHS in the records she provided there is no way that she didn't unless she didn't send a government email despite being the head of the state department for months.

This actually isn't that unlikely. Many politicians don't use email at all for government business, exactly for this reason (it all gets preserved).

Honestly, this preserving all emails is rather stupid to begin with. We don't preserve other communication media completely, I see no reason why email should somehow be special. It just forces politicians to use private accounts or not use email at all.

Comment Re:In other news (Score 1) 609

Because she self hosted her own email there is no such third party and we have to "trust" that she didn't delete government emails.

Not really. If she sent them to someone else's government email address, then they would still be preserved. Of course, if she sent an email to someones private email address then that would be lost... but I don't think you would have access to that email anyway, as it would just be an email between two private email accounts.

Comment Re:White balance and contrast in camera. (Score 4, Informative) 420

The thing is, in the provided picture, the dress actually IS white and gold, or at least grey and gold

I'm sorry, but it is definitely not. I just opened it up in GIMP, and the blue areas have hue values between 225 and 230. While yes, the saturation is low (30-40), that definitely still makes it blue, albeit a washed out blue.

Load it up in an editor and snip pieces of it out if you don't believe me, look at them on their own, compare them to color swatches

I did. It's definitely blue. Not highly saturated blue, but blue nonetheless. It's certainly not white/grey.

Comment Re:Split Shifts (Score 2) 301

The best solution to union meddling concerning the split shifts is to employ half of the drivers in the morning and the other half in the evening.

This has to be one of the dumbest things I have ever read.

Tell me genius, how are you going to drive the same amount of buses with half the employees on a shift? Or are you under the impression that people can drive two buses at once?

Comment Re:About right (Score 5, Insightful) 246

Seriously... what's the point of putting someone in prison for four years for that? If anything a sentence like that is just as likely to turn them to harder, more violent crime than rehabilitate them.

It makes much more sense to give first time offenders for stupid crimes like this a year of probation, a significant amount of community service, and forced enrollment in some sort of vocational school / work program.

You don't reform people by making them sit on their asses for four years talking to other criminals. You reform them by putting them to useful work.

Comment Re:Why are we calling a crooner an 'artist' ? (Score 1) 157

Except that two singers performing the same song will often produce two very different results. So clearly there is at least some artistic license in singing.

Your "typing in a program from a magazine" analogy is completely flawed since two people typing in a program from a magazine will produce identical code. Two singers singing the same song will obviously not produce identical performances.

Slashdot Top Deals

Math is like love -- a simple idea but it can get complicated. -- R. Drabek

Working...