"We know the law, but Apple only offers one year warranty. Good luck trying, you will need a legally-valid exame by some specialist that states that the defect was in fact not caused by the user."
This is exactly correct. You would have to prove that the problem was there when the macbook was sold to you, ie that the macbook components could not withstand two years of "normal" use.
Apple uses NAND which sues some of this technology
Freudian slip much?
On the other hand, if you're pointed away from the sun, without any significant dust in the way to reflect back the sun's light, I don't see how the sun would contaminate anything. I'm probably missing something...
Taking the law into your own hands is never the appropriate action unless you are defending your life from an IMMEDIATE risk.
I agree, but then again, one could make the argument that "endangering others by breaking the law is never the appropriate action unless you are defending your life from an IMMEDIATE risk". I agree that people who drive in the left lane at the speed limit are obnoxious, and are making the highway a more dangerous place to drive... but people who speed are just as culpable as people who intentionally drive the speed limit in the fast lane. Both are putting their personal desires above the general good.
how many people do you know use their work networks to download pirated content
None, actually. That's a really stupid thing to do... The only thing worse than being slapped with a 100k fine for downloading some music is also getting fired over it.
If they are downloading them, they are sharing them as well.
That's simply not true. They could have turned off uploading.
To do nothing is to be nothing.
