Comment Re:Privacy (Score 2) 59
Privacy is the next big thing.
The perception of privacy is the next big thing. We've already mortgaged our privacy for beads and trinkets.
Privacy is the next big thing.
The perception of privacy is the next big thing. We've already mortgaged our privacy for beads and trinkets.
If you have a specific concern, tell us.
I had to take a bus a few weeks ago because of the weather and there are a whole lot of mutants out there. A couple of them even looked like they could have been Slashdot readers.
RF radiation and high-fructose corn syrup are as good an explanation as any.
Me. I love earbuds. I even love the old fashioned kind that sit outside the ear canal. I've found some that have remarkable sound and they're a little expensive but man are they good.
This has nothing to do with financial resources. Pretty much every single apartment building in Finland has a sauna somewhere for the residents.
You're talking about a country with a very high standard of living and well-distributed wealth. Yes, it has to do with financial resources.
it's quite the contrary, we (finns) throw water to stove, which boils immediately forming steam (löyly) which fills the 'sauna room' (löylyhuoneen).
Considering the drinking habits of the Finns I've known, I'm not sure I want to be copying their health regime.
I've known some big drinkers, but Finns are in a class by themselves.
After a while, the meat is done, but you're not.
I've seen some of the people going into the sauna. I'm pretty sure you'd get done.
Hotter than the boiling point of water? I would think your eyeballs would explode or something.
Germans also do "Aufguss" (not sure what Fins call it or whether they do it) in 90C.
"Aufguss"? Is that like a sex thing? I couldn't find it on Urban Dictionary.
90C? Don't you start to cook at that temperature? What the hell.
Of course. I would bet that you'd get the same results from people who spend an hour doing tai chi or meditating or just relaxing on the back porch with a good book.
But I can't remember, is the sauna the one where naked people whip each other with eucalyptus leaves or is that the steam bath? Or is that something from a nightmare?
So stay away from full-length mirrors.
Big surprise: People that take time out of their day for things they enjoy and self-care live longer. Who knew?
So, someone who has the time and financial resources to spend an hour in a sauna probably has a long list of factors that will contribute to longer life, none of which involve the life-giving effects of sitting in a hot box.
If 6 was 9...
Now you're talking about good music: http://youtu.be/Ui4ckbUNe3k
I said elsewhere that this is a scam for the following reasons.
Her Tumbler account (Swiked) shows the initial photo asking what color is the dress. A day or so later she posts a second picture of someone wearing the blue/black version, stating:
this is the dress as i saw it on the day of the wedding. blue and black. It's just that one photo bUT it's so weird???!??
Here's the thing, she does not say the second photo is the same dress ON THE DAY of the wedding, only that the photo shows what she saw.
What most likely happened was she took the first picture on a different day and because it's white/gold, it took on the cast of the lighting to give a blue hue and her friends had a disagreement over the color which started the whole thing, especially if someone is red/green colorblind.
Second, if you look at the top edge of the dress in the first picture you can clearly see what would be considered "virgin" light, i.e. light which is not reflected but directly falling on to the dress. If the claim is that our eyes are fooling us because of the bright background or because we can't be sure what the lighting situation is, this light should produce a different color under it, just as light shining across a rippled surface can produce different colors.
Except it doesn't. There is no transition from the slice of light to the shaded portion. It's one continuous tone. In fact, as the picture shows, there are multiple shadows of different angles and lighting conditions which should produce different colors, but they don't. For instance, under the cape/shawl toward the upper right, the area under the shadow is darker but not a different color.
Further, if our eyes are being deceived by the bright background, covering up all but a small portion of the dress should reveal the true colors because then there would be nothing to confuse us. Except that doesn't work either, the dress stays as white/gold with a blue hue.
And finally, if you look at the edging in the middle of the picture then down to the lower left corner (our left), you can see shadows under the gold edging. If the dress in the picture was blue/black you would not see such distinct shadows as are shown in the picture.
So, the dress in the original picture IS NOT the same dress she shows a day or so later but is the same style.
One final thought. The opposite of blue on the color wheel is gold and the opposite of black is white. However, if you look at what is blue and black in the "good" picture, they are not the correct parts. The bodice is blue which means in the reversed portion the bodice of the original picture should be gold and the edging should be white. Except that is not what is shown. The bodice is white and the edging is gold.
And for the record, I am not red/green colorblind. I pass all the Ishihara color tests without issue.
then I'll care about what "prominent members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate" think about climate change.
Take a look at what James Inhofe (R-OK) who is chairman of the fucking Senate Committee on the Environmentthinks of global warming. TRIGGER WARNING: IF STUPIDITY UPSETS YOU DO NOT CLICK.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein