Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:So now (Score 1) 656

35 years in prison for downloading scientific articles. Really? What a great country he and I share, where we give those convicted of murder softer sentences than we do for some "copyright infringers".

The first image that popped in my head was some lawyer or pretend-human working for the Fuck-You-AA jumping up and down in joy shouting, "Two thousand two hundred fifty per song? That's chickenshit compared to this! If we can get each case bumped up to 50 years in jail and four million dollars, minimum, just like this, we can get whole slews of these filthy downloaders offing themselves! Problem solved!"

The sad thing is that greed, whether for fame, notoriety, or recognition, or even just for money -- and who's to say that any or all of those might have figured in the case of the prosecutor here -- has gone unchecked and allowed to run rampant for a long long time. Lawrence Lessig cites that "...we live in a world where the architects of the financial crisis regularly dine at the White House..." Increasingly, it's become more and more commonplace, and perhaps even acceptable, for supposed infringers -- more often than not people who have no access to expensive legal support -- to be punished so harshly that it makes no sense, without regard to any actual form of "justice." If not acceptance, then this behavior has so far generated only apathy.

Comment Re:MIGHT (Score 1) 103

The reason for the spelling was that my old Nom de plume (I would tell you what that means but I'm far to dumb, was already taken, (by me) because I'd lost the password, (slashdot had no password retrieval mechanism at that time) and it was easier to change the spelling and re register.

Aww, I feel for you, I really do. It just doesn't change the fact that you're an idiot. A superannuated idiot, for sure, but then idiocy like yours knows no boundaries of sex, age, or race.

Comment Re:Upgrade Instructions for Cisco Clients (Score 1) 351

From reading the article, apparently even deselecting automatic updates isn't enough, because part of the constantly-updating TOS reads:

“In some cases, in order to provide an optimal experience on your home network, some updates may still be automatically applied, regardless of the auto-update setting.”

Comment O Noes Teh Poor Ices! (Score 1) 103

ice evaporates in a vacuum

Wow, did someone rewrite the laws of physics as regards the chemical properties of solid water when I wasn't looking? Goddamn, that must mean that comets don't actually exist, because they are, after all, agglomerations of dust, rock, and... wow, look at that! ice, totally exposed to the vacuum of space, and couldn't possibly survive long enough for our obviously ignorant, non-creationist "scientists" to observe them and catalog four thousand one hundred and eighty-five of them.

And I guess Jupiter's moon Europa is shot, too, because it's just so much ice and rock at what might as well be the partial vacuum of 0.1 Pa. It's incredible that our ignorant, non-creationist astronomers can still see it in their telescopes, considering that ice evaporates in a vacuum. Wow, they must have such incredible imaginations!

Comment Let me summarize for you: (Score 1) 233

Ah, but proper, intelligent communication, both written and spoken, are.

No they're not. That is the delusion of conceited assholes who like to pretend they're better than other people.

Did your calendar list "idiolect" as your word for the day and made it so that you had to find any way at all to inject it into a conversation?

The term idiolect is a well-known, well established

term used in linguistics when discussing exactly this issue.

To quote one of my parent posters

The fact that so many are uneducated and ignorant does not invalidate the use of the term.

The irony of your effort to cast my using a technical term with a technical, specific, and appropriate meaning as somehow not being useful in a post claiming that artificial, technical, specific language is superior to natural language is not lost on me. It'd be amusing if I thought you'd done it on purpose.

Nice try though.

TL;DR: Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak! Whoosh!

Comment Re:but... (Score 1) 233

languages are not constructed in anything resembling a technical fashion.

Ah, but proper, intelligent communication, both written and spoken, are. Knowledge of usage, syntax, and grammar are necessary to be able to decode what the other person is saying and contribute intelligently to a conversation, unlike, say, dropping the word linguistics in a totally off-topic, tangential response and using meaningless junk phrases.

Attacking what someone says as a "meaningless junk phrase" is hardly conducive to fostering discussion, especially when one uses meaningless junk phrases, too. When was the last time you waved your hand in someone's face and said "Nitwit! Blubber! Oddment! Tweak!" and got anything close to resembling a meaningful response? Did your calendar list "idiolect" as your word for the day and made it so that you had to find any way at all to inject it into a conversation?

If you're trying to get your posts modded Informative or Interesting, the least you can do is use a proper a href reference instead of leaving people wondering if you're using some made-up word from your idiolect and having to use the autodetect feature of the google translator. Oh, and drop the ad-hominem attacks, too. Attacking a poster does not make up for a lack of relevant content in a post.

Slashdot Top Deals

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...