Comment Re:CFAA (Score 3, Insightful) 376
Extortion laws ought to apply here as well.
Extortion laws ought to apply here as well.
As the article states, it's very rarely only $20... they're charging $20 per song. And yes, they expect you to admit guilt along with the payment.
I think he's saying use Tor to avoid being caught in the first place. Of course there's nothing stopping Rightscorp from just accusing people at random, since there's absolutely no recourse for the falsely accused but to pay up or lose your Internet connection.
I don't really care which way they go. My point was they haven't decided anything, but in typical
As for politians making decisions on technology, that's usually a bad idea.
One politician said it failed... all other reports of the project (even very recently) have said it's been a success. The actual article says they are convening a panel of experts to consider whether to go back to Microsoft, so despite the misleading summary here, nothing has been decided.
The actual source article says they are *considering* going back to Microsoft, while the title and summary here imply its a foregone conclusion.
Yep... if they had been forthright about what they were buying and why in the first place, there likely wouldn't be any controversy here. The controversy is that they lied about it.
The same applies to Cellphones.
And yet Apple takes about 90% of the profits.
Selling at a loss and making up for it in volume does not seem to have worked for all the other phone manufacturers. And Apple is selling at a premium.
Tell that to Samsung... they're doing just fine. And LG, and Motorola, and Lenovo, etc... Only HTC is hurting, and even they just turned a profit for the first time in awhile.
I agree... we don't really know what his demeanor was. If he was loud, abusive, or threatening, he should have been kicked off the flight for that, not for a tweet about rude service. If he stayed calm and complied with the airline employees' instructions, then only the gate agent was in the wrong.
Nowhere in TFA did it say he had a "temper tantrum" nor did it say he yelled at the agent. True it only tells one side of the story, but you're applying your own imagination as to how things really went down.
And the slashdot summary states the children were age 6 and 9.
Southwest allows families with children aged 4 or under to board between the 'A' and 'B' groups, or during the 'A' group if the parent is in the 'A' group.
They're aren't rude and irrational people in the 3rd world?
Calling someone "rude" is neither intimidating nor harassment.
Their policy says it extends to children aged 4 and under, his kids are older than 4.
She said he'd be arrested if he didn't delete the tweet. The arrest would violate the 1st amendment.
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.
