Comment Re:Concorde (Score 1) 238
I have a New Scientist that is over 20 years old that talked about a Concorde replacement. The reckoned even back then you could go twice as far with twice as many passengers for the same cost. That's a quarter of the ticket price of Concorde.
What I never got about Concorde is why they didn't do trans Pacific flights with a fuel stop at say Honolulu where you land fill with fuel and take off again without disembarking the passengers. Still much quicker than a 747 and opening up potentially lucrative Los Angeles/San Francisco to Tokyo routes.