Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment And even more... (Score 1) 268

...advertising campaigns start off soft.

Like a year or so in advance.
Planting stories tangentially related to the product in order to slowly build up awareness and interest among the general population.

Hey! Did you know they are making a new Star Wars movie?!
And it's done by that guy who made that last Star Trek movie everyone loved?!
And it has all the old actors from the original movies, not the new ones from those prequels!
And OH MY GAWD! Did you know that they're gonna put Sherlock the Smaug the Khaaaaaan Cumberbatch in it?! He's soooo cooool/sexxxy!

IT'S GONNA BE GREAT!

Comment Fourth possibility... (Score 4, Insightful) 308

They've ALWAYS had a draft like that. And any excuse will do to try to push it through.
If there is no excuse, try to push it through anyway.

It's not a conspiracy. It's not a coincidence. They are not waiting for or furnishing events.
They see such events as INEVITABLE. It is a part of their view of reality. It is their life philosophy.
Their BELIEF SYSTEM.
They think they're the good guys.

And once you look around, you'll notice that in other groups of people as well.
Gun nuts really do believe that government is after their guns.
Rich people really do believe that poor people are all lazy.
Hippies really do believe that all people are good, just misunderstood.
Justin Bieber fans really believe that he can sing.

Comment Nothing gross there. (Score 1) 399

You said it yourself.

an average estimate

If you are clocking in below average... you are below average.

I.e. That is either not an average woman, or she is not eating all calories she needs cause she's on a diet, or she is getting her calories elsewhere, OR, and here's a radical thought...
The author of that article is not as scientifically literate and/or diligent as she thinks she is.
And either those men and women were doing radically different things or it is simply not even bad science but bad and inaccurate measurement.

1475 calories per day is VERY low for any adult.
Those are Auschwitz and Mauthausen portions.
Only difference being that these would-be astronauts don't have to do backbreaking work for 12 hours each day.
At least those doing just fine on 6 powerbars a day are not.
Regardless, if you can eat that much and not lose weight, you are FAR below the average, bordering on malnourished.

http://www.holocaustresearchpr...
       

Food
Prisoners in the camp received three meals daily - in the morning, at midday and in the evening.
In the morning the prisoners received only a half litre of black coffee or of a herbal brew known as tea. These liquids were generally unsweetened.
The midday meal consisted of one portion of soup measuring about three quarters of a litre, with a value of 350 - 400 calories. The soup was foul tasting and watery, with 'meat' four times a week and the rest with vegetables.
For supper the prisoners were given about 300 grams of bread and something extra in the shape of about 25 grams of sausage or margarine, or a spoonful of jam or cheese. The food value of supper came to about 900 - 1000 calories

Given such hunger rations most prisoners after a few weeks in the camp began to develop symptoms of exhaustion, which led in consequence to people being reduced to the state of 'Moslems'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

The work in the quarries - often in unbearable heat or in temperatures as low as -30 C (-22 F)[20] - led to exceptionally high mortality rates.[40][note 6]
The food rations were limited, and during the 1940-1942 period, an average inmate weighed 40 kilograms,[41] roughly 88 pounds.
It is estimated that the average energy content of food rations dropped from about 1,750 calories a day during the 1940-1942 period, to between 1,150 and 1,460 during the next period.
In 1945, the energy content was even lower and did not exceed 600 to 1,000 calories a day; that is less than a third of the energy needed by an average worker in heavy industry.[1]
This led to the starvation of thousands of inmates.

Comment Re:Compelling, but a mix still better... (Score 1) 399

There's a big difference between "a suggestion to send an all female crew cause they eat less and have smaller muscles" and "as long as men are around to open doors for them, women can do almost everything a man can".

No. That's the exact same thing. Only phrased differently.

Both those lines define women as weak, small and incapable to perform physical work.
Only difference is that the "men to open doors" line is more direct with the backhandedness, while "eat less small muscles" would be more sinister - cause it does not criticize (in)directly, but "sparks debate".
Like this whole slashdot topic.

Women of the same weight as men have a 5-10% lower basal metabolic rate (and that bmr typically accounts for 60-70% of your total energy expended - source).

Read your source again.

Women in general, have a metabolic rate about 5-10% lower than men even when of the same weight and height. Men generally burn more calories at rest than women because they naturally have more muscle.

Exercise builds muscle.
Have them doing the same muscle-maintaining exercises during their trip and see how men and women of same weight and build fare then.

The whole article only indicates that maybe men were doing more exercise.
Meanwhile, that 1475 calories per day woman was chasing an Auschwitz diet. Which was designed to, combined with hard labor, exterminate people.
If she was not losing weight, only component missing is hard labor.

OR... Bad science. Badly measured or misreported measurements.
Or that woman is beyond petite and more like a midget.
http://www.holocaustresearchpr...
       

Food
Prisoners in the camp received three meals daily - in the morning, at midday and in the evening.
In the morning the prisoners received only a half litre of black coffee or of a herbal brew known as tea. These liquids were generally unsweetened.
The midday meal consisted of one portion of soup measuring about three quarters of a litre, with a value of 350 - 400 calories. The soup was foul tasting and watery, with 'meat' four times a week and the rest with vegetables.
For supper the prisoners were given about 300 grams of bread and something extra in the shape of about 25 grams of sausage or margarine, or a spoonful of jam or cheese. The food value of supper came to about 900 - 1000 calories

Given such hunger rations most prisoners after a few weeks in the camp began to develop symptoms of exhaustion, which led in consequence to people being reduced to the state of 'Moslems'.

Comment Re:You keep using that word... "basically"... (Score 1) 422

If you're eating for taste rather than an energy boost or a sugar buzz, fructose has the advantage that less is needed

You eat to satisfy a craving.
Be it taste, sugar buzz, energy boost, feeling happy like the people on tv eating the same food...

You STOP eating when you reach "an energy boost or a sugar buzz".
Trouble is, when it's all mostly for taste... and it's loaded with calories... and there's no "STOP!" signal...

Comment Re:Exercising "roughly the same amount" (Score 1) 399

If women are eating half a portion and men are losing weight despite eating double portions - that's not BMR.

For a 30 year old woman, 160 cm in height, with a weight of 50 kg, with little to no activity BMR is 1547 calories.
Makes you wonder if that "least metabolically active female [who] expended 1,475 calories per day" was a midget or anorexic.

Slashdot Top Deals

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...