This is very hard-line. Despite what the reddit atheist crowd thinks, there are a lot of religious people who understand that there is no scientific basis for their beliefs. These people, like us seculars, are able to distinguish faith from reason, but they choose to partake of both.
I also have a problem with scientific reasoning when it is overapplied. Sometime, stuff is hard to measure -- for example, social phenomena and things like how prejudices play out in different situations. Saying "but there's no scientific proof!" is used as an easy way to dismiss any of these more abstract ideas, regardless of merit. When a teacher keeps a student after class and verbally abuses them, there may not be proof, but there are at least concrete actions to point to. But teachers don't usually do that -- if they don't like a kid, it's all subtle, it's all "the way they said it", it's all disputable. If you can find a way to measure those things at all, it's usually ingenious, because there's no formula for stuff like that. Science is also frequently invoked, incorrectly, to explain differences that are the results of circumstance (an extreme example would be saying that black people in the US are less successful because they lack intelligence... but a more subtle and insidious example could be saying that women are better shoppers because they have a gatherer instinct). Evolutionary psychology is infamous for being misapplied in this way. And I will say, this kind of reasoning is particularly prevalent among young students in STEM fields who don't understand the limitations of scientific research. Aka about 60% of the slashdot crowd.
Okay, wait, wait. You believe the Republican party is better on voting than the left? For real? Remember those GOP-sponsored "voter ID" laws that were ruled unconstitutional because they disenfranchised minorities, poor, and the elderly? I do, because I went door to door distributing lists of acceptable ID documents (you needed a copy of the rules written down, you see, because they were too complicated to remember). The conservative wing were the folks who challenged the Voting Rights Act, and after that got neutered, there were voter-ID and other voter-suppression bills going into effect inside twenty-four hours. All by Republican politicians, in conservative areas.
Hmm, other stuff. Labor rights, well I can't comment on the American left, but the actual philosophical left is strongly opposed to abuses of the working class and extremely pro-union. (Frankly I'm surprised you mentioned it; seems like "union" is a dirty word to people on the right). Though given that our country is ruled by the rich with zero accountability to anyone else, unions right now are a joke (hey, I bet we agree on this part!). Although actually you also seem to be arguing that unions have too MUCH power, given that they can mandate you join a union if you want to work at a particular place or in a particular capacity. This strikes me as very much unrelated to government, probably because it is a mechanic of how unions function.
Educational rights... you mean private schools? Yeah, I mean, I guess I value equal education for everyone more than I value the rights of rich parents to send their kids to fancy schools? I don't know, that one's iffy, but the people with advantages to tend to send their kids to private schools to avoid being affected by our current educational crisis, and that's not sustainable. (By the way, I also taught in a public school, and for all the money the city was supposedly pouring into the system, we didn't see a dime).
The abortion issue has been widely discussed and religious groups are allowed to opt out of paying for contraceptives for exactly this reason. The "rights" issue with abortion, however, is about whether people are permitted to have them (and if so, to have actual access to them) in the first place. That is a much larger scale issue with huge human and human rights implications. I'm also going to go ahead and point out that most of planned parenthood is mammograms, pap smears, and other crucial preventive care unrelated to sex. Just in case you were talking about that.
Healthcare I'm not going to defend anyone on. I feel like Obama may have had something with the single-payer option, but when that went down, so did most of the real good the ACA could've done. As an actual liberal, I believe in socialized medicine, and even if you don't I think we can all agree that our current system is a price-gouging, patient-neglecting, claim-denying, unnecessary-test-prescribing, big-pharma-driven, loophole-using, corporate-sponsored and generally clawing-kicking-biting-and-hairpulling cash grab. Seriously, fuck our healthcare system. Fuck it entirely.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.