Early example of spamdexing?

Or he could be current rms.

If anything agnosticism is opposed to solipsism. My empirical experience shows no evidence of gods, but I know my empirical experience is not enough, so I waste no time or effort in believing, disbelieving or telling other people what to believe or disbelieve.

YEC is another matter altogether. It is a falsable theory, and patently false unless we basically ignore all the knowledge we have about physics and chemistry - knowledge which we regard as valid because it can be tested and has been tested through repeatable experiments.

Splitting hairs, but that's not the dictionary definition of atheist. That's closer to agnostic.

It does take a leap of faith to state "There is no God" (atheism). The sentence isn't testable or falsable.

Agnosticism, on the other hand, is truly faithless as it avoids the question of God's existence (or at least it admits it is pointless).

But would you get a "No dial tone" error with that?

Just curious.
Posting to undo accidental downmod...

That could be achieved with devolution of tax powers. Decentralized taxes are known to work well in federal countries. Independence can be seen as overkill for that purpose.

It's almost 150 years too late for that, but there must still be room for some patent trolling.

Let's see, I've got an idea: on a mobile device! Darn, probably also too late by half a century. On the internet! A few decades late, too... I've got it: On the cloud! That's where the money is!

Out of curiosity, do we have a plan to take back the "North Sea gold" and did it ever cross our minds whether oil/gas companies really have "nationalities" at all? As a resident of Scotland I often hear oil as an argument for "yes", but I wonder if that flies in the face of trade agreements.

Well, for certain meanings of the verb "to do", it makes certain sense (though with an awkward word order).

"This (i.e. this guy/gal... whoever is pushing this law?) indeed did management (whoever management is) to (i.e. in order to) pass"

And much slower than the ATmega1284p RISC featured here, regardless of "how many bits".

To be fair one could argue the number of "bits" of a CPU is conventionally the width of the data bus. The Z80 also supports, in addition to the 8-bit operations, 16-bit arithmetic operations and 16-bit registers (okay, usually those were pairs of 8-bit registers, but 16-bit register implementations do exist), yet nobody would call that thing a 16-bit CPU. Similarly nobody would call an i7 a 128-bit CPU just because it features 128-bit registers and 128-bit operations.

Shakespeare's pronunciation was almost certainly post-vowel shift. Country matters.