Because a) polygamous marriages are usually an excuse for some guy to build a harem, or there is often some kind of brainwashing or mistreatment going on; and b) there would be a huge legal mess about ownership of property and rights over children and so forth.

But if someone wants to start trying to push it through the courts they can go ahead.

Amazingly, Thomas actually went against Scalia this week on the Texas Confederate license plate case.

It has been well documented that it was not a 'typo.'

It's been well documented that you're wrong. Sorry.

No, actually, it's you who seems confused. The basis of this ruling is is hardly something new. Scalia, in another case, made the exact argument that you need to consider the context of the actual text. Of course, now that that argument doesn't give him the outcome he wants, he completely flip-flopped for this case, but that's Scalia for you.

This was not a case of poor word choices

You know how sometimes people are completely wrong? This is one of those times.

Right, because an iPhone app is exactly the same as a museum or a history book.

But do people actually believe someone who flies the flag is saying bring back slavery or a succession from the Union?

So you've never been to the south?

but when the Civil war broke out it was not all about slavery.

Yes, actually, it was. Many of the seceding states specifically cited the preservation of slavery as the reason they wanted out.

If you're going to go ahead and ignore the clear intent of the law, scrap the whole thing, and take away insurance from millions of people over what's essentially a typo, then OK, I get to go ahead ignore the definition of 'state'.

You are aware, right, of why the 17th Amendment exists?

Whatever the case, the courts should be rewriting when it's a clear cut, cut-and-dried case of an error.

Such as this one.

Git is actually the opposite of useful.

So you gave up PC gaming because you can't stop spending money that you didn't need to spend?

OK? The point is that it's not standard. Macro names must follow the same rules as variable names, ie, letters, numbers, and underscores only; and can only start with underscore or letter.

I'm not sure why you're want a macro named '@' anyway. C++ already has punctuation strewn everywhere. The last thing we need is more funny characters. :-b

Bzzt. Dollar sign is a gcc extension.