ENSO has no long--term effect on climate. ENSO is a short term variation.
THE PURPOSE of models is to do forecasting. So far, no models can accurately project the behavior of ENSO.
The purpose of the climate models is to forecast climate, not short-term events that have no effect on the trend.
ENSO is irrelevant to climate, it's interesting for weather forecasting.
Thermohaline circulation.
Two parts - "thermo" and "haline".
Of course hotter water rises, if the salinity is unchanged.
But add salt and things get more interesting.
That is not a climate model. It has no physical basis. Models are not curve fitting.
No, what religions do is torture and murder heretics...
And prevent their papers from being published in scientific journals.
Oh, go on, just for laughs.
Please name one paper that was prevented from being published.
If ENSO cannot be predicted to any great degree (it cannot), yet it has a major effect on climate models, and now another effect is found that is claimed to have a far greater effect than ENSO, what then?
ENSO has no long--term effect on climate. ENSO is a short term variation.
(People who obsess about ENSO seem not to have heard of conservation of energy).
please link to an example of "sketchy science" that has been proved wrong by more solid, peer-reviewed science.
I know you're just smacking down a troll, but climate models have been over-estimating warming for years, as demonstrated by this science.
From the commentary:
Ultimately the causes of this inconsistency will only be understood after careful comparison of simulated internal
climate variability and climate model forcings with observations from the past two decades
Recent papers have investigated this and found that when either observed ENSO conditions are forced on the model, or model runs are picked whose simulated ENSO matches observed ENSO there is better agreement with observed temperatures.
By the way, the models don't just overestimate warming since 1997ish, they also underestimate it before 1997.
Oh, sorry, I didn't realise I was talking to an insane person.
Hope you get better.
Bye.
The swap file holds pages for which there is no room in RAM.
So you're putting the swap file in RAM.
Odd.
Do you know what a swap file is for?
So why are you worried about someone being able to read your swap file, which for some unfathomable reason is in ram, but not your decryption keys, which are also in ram?
But they're in RAM.
If someone can read your RAM they can read your decryption key.
especially if you're one of those experimental types that likes to put a SWAP file in RAM and encrypt it.
Why would you put the swap file in RAM?
Why would you bother encrypting something that's in RAM?
The commonality amongst the early fascists could be seen in the name itself. A symbol of sticks bound together to product something strong, also the symbol of authority used by Roman Caesars. Thus a focus on a strong-man style central government, strong nationalism with a militaristic leaning.
Yup, just look at any US 10 cent coin struck between 1916 and 1945.
News from two centuries ago - "Yorktown captured by French Terrorists".
Looks stupid doesn't it? That's what you get when you oversimplify these things and assume that the backers are equivalent to the perpetrators. The backers in this case may be just as unpleasant as Napolean.
Assuming you mean Napoleon, what the hell does he have to do with Yorktown?
Are you talking about the siege of Yorktown in 1781?
And Napoleon who took power in 1799?
If they had actually identified the trajectory of the missile from a satellite, they would also easily know which side of the Russia/Ukraine border it originated on... which they do not.
A Buk has a range of about 20 miles.
The crash site is about 23 miles from the closest Russian border.
A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson
