Comment Re:Who would hire a ketamine user? (Score 1) 102
Furthermore, that line of reasoning only works on people that could be blackmailed, which would suggest the best candidates are those that are openly deviants.
If it's just the link he's providing he'll probably be okay (though has libel even been tested in the face of wilfully linking without regard for the truth? - the piracy argument was lost on this one, but what about libel?), but if he's including the descriptions he's fucked if it goes to court
Was it actually lost? I'm not aware of anything actually holding up in court. ICE has seized domain names, but all of those are just cowboy operations where they shoot from the hip and don't let questions be asked because of national security. I know in Spain and the UK, linking sites have been explicitly declared legal, and I believe the US government is trying to avoid any precedent on this matter.
OK, what do you think is more effective?
Just having humans searching everything. They would probably be doing that anyway since dogs are not very reliable (not because of inability to use their sense of smell to detect it, but because they are dogs.).
Police don't need to get dogs 'accepted.' They're already accepted. I don't even know what you're thinking here.
Dogs sniffing for hidden electronics is not a commonly accepted practice, and I suspect that this is probably part of a campaign to make it one.
IF I HAD A MINE SHAFT, I don't think I would just abandon it. There's got to be a better way. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.