Yes, there's some variety, with binary or trinary star systems and huge variance in the masses of the central star being common ones, but from a planetary point of view, our Solar System is a rarity.
Just because most planets belong to a solar system doesn't mean that most solar systems don't have planets. That it is atypical for a planet to orbit a star in no way indicates that it is atypical for a star to have orbiting planets.
If they don't attempt to sue, then their legal department must have found, the law does not apply, contrary to what (some of) Slashdot thinks.
Or, it's not worthwhile for them to bring a lawsuit. Discretion can be exercised for reasons other than not having the law on your side. That's a lot of how the patent troll racket works. Even if you could fight the troll and win, it is often not in your direct financial best interest to do so.
I'm not sure how much it was an over reaction. Seemed reasonable to me. It's unfortunate it happened, but TPTB were screwed no matter what they did.
If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.
If it was reported, dismissed, and something bad happens, then it was something that was preventable.
If they did what they did, it's labeled as an overreaction.
It's not like passengers were ordered off the plane, stripped searched, and received a free body cavity search. They were inconvenienced for a few hours before a 11 hour flight. It happens.
Everything beyond a mild chuckle was an overreaction.
If it was reported, and did nothing, then it gets out that authorities didn't investigate a possible threat and are inept.
Unless they stuck to their guns and pointed out, like most of the posters here likely will, that it's incredibly stupid to ground a plane over a joke SSID.
fair enough points. but it all boils down to choice.
Except for the fact that MS effectively killed all reasonable choice. I would argue that Apple was a bit of a co-conspirator in this matter, as they priced themselves out of being a legitimate mainstream competitor while taking the public's eye as the most visible choice that wasn't MS and actually contributed to the IE lock-in. You are not realizing the impracticality of other choices because of MS's actions.
If anything one could argue the exact opposite, due to M$ policy, it caused others to get outraged and make competing products better.
Except that healthy competition does a way better job of that than fighting a powerful. The iron grip of IE was a small dark age in regards to browser advancements. The rapid growth we've seen as of late is the result of having a number of competing browsers trying to outdo one another.
I mean they could just not exist at all, and we wouldnt have a lot of what we do have today. you can make the same complains against any big company, ma bell, the railroads, electricity. while it may not be perfect, its STILL orders of magnitude better than the previous generation
You are assuming that if they hadn't exist, nobody else would have fulfilled the same niche. That is only true on accidental inventions. Had Alexander Graham Bell been struck by lightning on the way to patent office, we would've had Elisha Gray to take his spot the same day, and probably at least a half dozen others within a year or two.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion