Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment I strongly doubt this (Score 1) 527

I run OpenDNS and we have about 12,000,000 end users. A large number of those are comcast users. We would know if this was true, and we haven't had a single report about it.

I also know a few /really smart/ people in the Comcast engineering department who run their DNS infrastructure. These guys wouldn't do something like block port 53.

Based on the above, there is no truth to this rumor from what I can tell and from those I've talked to. I think an update on this story is warranted.

The comcast engineering team pride themselves on running a great network and robust infrastructure and I think they do a pretty good job (though of course I'm biased and think OpenDNS does a better job on the DNS side of the house) :-)

-David

Comment Re:Do not use OpenDNS (Score 5, Informative) 175

I'm the founder of OpenDNS. I've decided to reply even though these comments are heinously wrong, and probably just me feeding the trolls...

We have never sold user data, ever. We also have no CDN bills, we don't even use a CDN. We've built a global BGP-speaking network with hundreds of peers around the world. I know, because I built it. We peer at LoNAP, LINX, PAIX, SeattleIX and on a few of the Equinix peering fabrics around the US.

The idea that we would build our business based on monitoring user data is preposterous. I wouldn't stand for it, nor would our employees. I'm confident that all our engineers are just as vocal or more vocal about doing the right thing than you are. We make it very clear how we make money, and it's all over our website. Go to http://guide.opendns.com and do a search. The sponsored results are ads where we get paid, the organic results are regular search results. That's how we make money. We might offer an enterprise for-pay service down the road as some of our customers begin to demand tighter integration with their network but for now, we're happy with our business. And I'm happy to report that we're profitable and stable, even in this economy.

And as to the OpenDNS proxy. It's true, we do redirect certain Google requests through a proxy so that we can make our OpenDNS shortcuts and some other features work more reliably. Two important things here: First, we peer with Google at every datacenter, so we aren't adding to your latency or anything else. Second, we don't log and store any data and we certainly don't care about it. We prefer to be able to confidently say we aren't keeping data on it. Of course, you are welcome to disable it by going into your settings and disabling the OpenDNS proxy. That's it. Do that and we don't ever see the request. Pretty easy. End of story.

David Ulevitch
Founder, OpenDNS
Intel

Submission + - Intel Answers Phenom with Unsupported CPU (pcper.com)

Vigile writes: "Sure the AMD Phenom is getting a lot of attention today but Intel wasn't going to let AMD's parade run without raining on it. In a response that seems more than a little strange, Intel brought in the release of performance data on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 processor which runs at 3.20 GHz on a 1600 MHz front-side bus. What makes this release odd is that AMD's parts don't even come close to competing with the existing Intel high-end CPUs and that there is no chipset from Intel or elsewhere that actually supports a 1600 MHz FSB! Using current motherboards that were overclocked to run the QX9770, the performance of the new processor is simply the fastest desktop processor we have seen."

Slashdot Top Deals

Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.

Working...