Valid point, but it comes back to where does it end, and why is this being allowed to happen? Why did no one in the school stand up and say this is wrong? Covering their ass would have been someone saying this is a mistake lets not do this, now they are just being petty and saying well its a reg that you can not have candy.

But as of right now they are getting away with it, sure it can be challenged but if it is honestly a law, which I can be certain of but if it is, then where does it end?

This has to be the most obsurd story I have ever seen. Honestly to say that we are banning all minimal nutrition foods, is rediculous. Why is it this country has started to give the Gov't so much power that now they decide what we are and aren't allowed to eat, and where we are going to eat it at? I know I love candy and hell in my old h/s the band kids sold some phenomenal chocolate chip cookies. We even had a snack line that you could get candy. What are the fundraisers now gonna be well were not gonna sell cookies or chocolate, we selling vegetables from now on and maybe some fruit. Seriously this is just rediculous. I don't blame the kid or the parents or even the kid that gave the candy to the girl. I would just skip detention and let them suspend my kid for however many days they want. This is just ludicrous. Hell even my kid whos 2 gets to eat chocolate and such every now and again. Its not like he gets it every day but really to have the gov't or the school or whomever step in and say its illegal is WRONG!

OK, so I am probably one of the few that doesn't play an FPS for the solo missions, as I strictly play MW and MW2 for the online multiplayer deathmatch scenarios, its just my flavor. The only 2 games I have actually completed as of late are Dragonage: Origins and FF XIII, Dragonage was a bit long but I created several different characters until I found the moveset and story line that I liked. FFXIII was fun in that it was linear and honestly doesn't take to incredibly long to beat. The only gripe I have for FFXIII is the leveling system. You can't even max out your characters until AFTER you beat the game. Now I did find that story intriguing as well and it definately was fun to beat but after I was done, i just have no urge to grind on the same monsters over and over just to get a few trophies or achievements depending on your system of choice. So in turn it depends on your style of gaming I am a console gamer who enjoys FPS for the online multiplayer deathmatches, and RPG's for the intriguing storylines and gameplay.

Such valid points that do have a sense of humor. Still it does not negate the point I was making. As it just enforces it, now if you want to debate my point feel free but if your just trying to enforce it then I agree.

OK you want to know an example, how bout the constant attacks on DOD and DOE systems from china, that are not publicly published all the time. The US infrastructure is a huge vulnerability and if the right person(s) were hired to do the job we could be seeing a sever outage of gas, power, and yes even the internet itself in the US. Lets think now, most companies are moving to web-based apps as a way of providing more for less. Records are mostly stored on servers anymore and not so much in hardcopy form. There are countless things we would need power for and if someone were to take out huge chunks of the power grid the results though may not cause extreme physical harm, unless followed up by another attack, could cause the loss of millions of dollars for companies. I'm not talking take out one source, I am saying multiple sources of power and energy all at the same time. Following that up with any type of physical attack would be even worse. So all they are doing is preparing for a worse case scenario and talking about how they can better harden their networks. Cyberwarfare is real and it is a threat, don't ever think it doesn't exist. Because though you may not recall it the Internet was down for a time in our history as was Google, and other services that society is coming to rely on. And though some of us could get a long without technology, others have it so intwined in their lives, that they just might lose their minds if they lost it.

Your right that the "chair" in question is necessarily the one that the user is sitting in, however you make it sound as if the OP by Agarax is is wrong when its not. For as much as you harden a network and lock it down and secure everything those issues where some user looks at an e-mail and says sure i'll visit your BOA page and input all my information again because well you apparently need it, come on. I have work on secure facilities where things were locked down tighter on the network than fort knox and yet still a user managed to get some form of malware on the network. It happens, unless you completely take away use of the internet from users which by the way I dont recommend as it makes for a very unhappy workplace. However, Antique Geekmeister you aren't wrong either as security through obscurity and just all around poor physical security and network security could also cause as much damage. So as we step back and look at this, we can't blame any single person because depending on what the vulnerability is that was exploited is truly what dictates where the problem started.

I have to say that just but reading the article and the way things seem to be going in the IT field just on support I can see where he is coming from. I myself have put to use google docs as a way of storing my files so that I can access them anywhere. Cloud Computing is definately penetrating the IT industry in its entirety. Apple's stance on this and their fear of everything is understood, as is everyones fear of the change. Many companies will change with the times, but can we honestly say that PC's are going to go away and the revolution is over? There are still many flaws in making things available over the cloud and a lot of companies would rather have the ability to maintain their own information as opposed to putting it on the cloud and losing control over the hardware and software that maintains it. Most will not trust the security of the cloud over the ability to run NIDS and other such devices to secure their own networks and files. So a valid fear yes, unsubtantiated no, but is it truly going to take over and make pc's secondary any time soon, doubtful.

Opera has not been relevant for quite some time, except for when I used opera mini on my bb some time ago I have not used it since. Especially since FF is releasing Fennec to the Android, and on top of that I use Google Chrome, FF, and IE8 on my PC's. So Opera has been surpassed by the Browser Market and now by buying the e-mail client they are trying to gain some ground, which I do not see happening. On a side not, there is also the Safari browser which I know a lot of people use, so honestly Opera is just limping along when it should probably just be bought out by someone who has a good foothold on the browser and e-mail market.

In this case I have to agree with what many people have said already. I have been with DOD and DOE, as well as other companies that deal with PII and HIPAA. If they are not willing to provide you with a laptop for work use at home then I wouldn't be doing work at home. Every company I have worked for that has its employees on a lease at all times provides the equipment for them especially when it comes to full-disk encryption. Also they have supplied blackberries and run a BES. The DOD makes it clear that if you come across any information above Unclass they reserve the right to confiscate your machine and your HDD. That is the risk you take even though you should be receiving any info above unclass on an unclass machine it is a risk none the less. So in turn I do agree with much that has already been said, have them provide you with a computer to do work at home or some other device or simply don't work from home. It is their network so they can impose any policies they want for the protection of said network but you also dont have to work from home if they aren't providing you with the means to do it.

I can understand that, there was an article just the other day that I wish I could cite, that said the good and bad of every phone in the Enterprise world. The two leaders to date as far as security and how well they protect information and work within the enterprise were Windows Mobile 7 and Blackberries. So though BES is getting worse and Android is growing, they were still one of the worst phones for use in an enterprise environment. I can see that changing in the near future as it is opensource and with all the apps that are coming out and developers that would like to use this in an enterprise.

I agree with much that has been said on the fact that PARENTS have to be responsible for what their kids eat. I for one am a parent and sure on occasion i'll stop and grab some BK or McDonalds for my son but honestly I feel your right shakrai. Parents aren't taking their kids to fast food places for the toy they are doing it because of the time it takes to prepare a meal. My fiance and I both work and yet we still find time at night to cook dinner for us and our son. America is the most obese nation and it is because everyone is getting to damn lazy to make dinner. Its all about instant gratification and hell if i can have someone else make my food for me why not pay the extra money to have it done. I for one don't want the Gov't telling me how to live my life and taxing or banning things just to use the excuse of well "its bad for you, so this is our way to make you quit." Sorry but I still smoke, still drink, and still drink pop. So all this banning and taxing of things because well you should quit so lets make it so you can't afford it is BS. */end rant/* But yes it is the PARENTS responsibility to dictate what your kids eat and how much they eat.

I don't completely agree with this. For one Android is so much limping along slowly, so much as it is growing in the consumer division for those people who really don't want AT&T or Apple. I have seen many of a people choose an Android phone over Windows Mobile and iPhone. However you are right when you say the corporate problems that Android has. Android does not offer the type of security that Windows Mobile does when dealing with encryption standards, profiles, or anything you would need for the corporate infrustructure when dealing with PII. However, if you are looking at it from strictly a corporate standpoint wouldn't Blackberry be MS biggest competitor when dealing with that market as they have had a stranglehold on it due to what they support? As I have worked in both the DOD and DOE only the blackberry is used to sync to their network. So saying that Android is limping along is invalid, since if you look outside the corporate infrastructure they have done nothing but grow.

Ok I am going to go with GOOD! Honestly I would rather have them paying attention to what they are doing. They chose the job of flying planes and regardless of whether or not theres autopilot I want them paying attention. The have a copilot so if they need to take a break to get some coffee or hit the head they can. But really they shouldn't be occupying themselves with facebook or anything of the sort. I want to be SAFE...maybe this could be a reason for some of the crashes where people say well "its unexplained" as of right now.

I have to agree with yakatz as ISPs can do whatever it is they please being that they are not regulated. Though many people are saying hey it in Hong Kong not the U.S, do you really think that will stop companies like Comcast from doing the same thing. My advice is that we all start using TOR and https: as a way of bypassing this. As I am on /. I would assume people know how to hide who they are and take advantage of knowing how to work around people forcing you to go to a specific DNS.