I think you may be suffering from paranoia.

And I think you need to get out more :)

Unfortunately, such feminists seem to be on the quiet side. Most of what seems to be heard from modern feminists--to say nothing of the SJWs--is as regards areas where women are perceived as being disadvantaged as compared with men. But it's radio silence when the opposite is true (or worse: open hostility towards those who raise issues where men are disadvantaged).

Ensuring women don't have fewer rights than men is a laudable goal, to be sure. But compared with supporting equality, it leaves out half of the equation. At one time, when women really could have been said to have been oppressed and had far fewer rights than men, such a position was probably justified. But in today's remarkably egalitarian society (if we're arguing over portrayal of the sexes in video games, you kind of have to admit we're down to details), things aren't quite so simple. And in my opinion, that is largely responsible for the serious image problem today's feminists seem to have.

Unfortunately, no. I've had to mute several people on my Twitter feed (from whom I normally enjoy seeing updates) because the controversy has not yet died.

It's a business account, you should have a business support line.

If you're talking about the IE vulnerability: according to IBM: 6,935.

Of course, if you want to count from the time IBM found the bug and reported it: roughly 180.

It would appear it's actually a "zero day [plus 18 years]".

"IBM corp's cybersecurity research team discovered the bug in May, describing it as a 'significant vulnerability' in the operating system.

"'The buggy code is at least 19 years old and has been remotely exploitable for the last 18 years,' IBM X-Force research team said in its blog on Tuesday."

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/se...

I know you guys recently made a big deal out of attacking free software projects, and tried to exploit a couple of recent bugs in them to evangelize for paid development, so this reminder of how bad bugs frequently are in paid development software is pretty embarrassing. But in context, pretending this somehow demonstrates how good paid development models are just looks silly.

No consumer protection? No ability to use one's own card? What is this, 1997?

Nice try, guys.

The 1% can afford to pay more.

Incorrect. It was discovered leaking a public IP through the Captcha in early 2013. That info was posted a number of places, including Buttcoin.org.

$170 is cheap considering how much time we spend using them.

Fucking reddit. *shakes fist*

I prefer to use a 50Hz grid, it gives a warmer heat.

OSS needs more reviewers than new contributors hacking on their pet feature. Heartbleed and Shellshock only ephasize the point. "Many eyes make all bugs shallow" rings false when there are no eyes.

Depends on the headlines you read.

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/v...

If you get your server administration advice from CNN's front page, perhaps your employer is not getting his/her money's worth.