Contemporary political thought seems to be about electing the right king.

One of the constants about startups is their youthful employee base -- young people have less economic baggage and less experience, and so can be had cheaper. Obamacare makes it much more expensive to hire such individuals by forcing companies to provide increasingly expensive health care, if even one employee ends up in the individual plan! Obamacare is not liable to make entrepreneurial activity more likely, but less.

... and he liked this. Enough said.

Shoulda just told the NSA.

The NYT is a hidebound unionista redoubt, resistant to new ideas from within or without. They think like employees, not entrepreneurs. And that, ultimately, is why they will fail.

Nonsense. The problem here is using a third, private party to elide the Fourth Amendment.

People pitched the timesharing computing model for a lot of reasons, lack of control of the hardware and the software rental treadmill being two of the largest. Every time I hear someone gushing over The Cloud and Software As A Service, it's history repeating itself.

Here. Interesting stuff.

when politicians seek to tax them.

China! High speed rail! Hurp! Derp!

is the sound of horror at people doing something about global warming that they don't approve of. Ultimately, this proves the old saw about Greens = Watermelons (green on the outside, red in the middle).

So, the business part is the only thing missing here.

"Buy our product or we'll agitate for standards that make them mandatory." It's shit like this that annoys me mightily about the NYT.

Please.

Is this some sort of drinking game? Because, AWESOME!