We should cut their heads and use royalty free phones

What is the limit of this madness?

There is also Smash Bros, WarioWare, Just Dance.

I heard it had a lukewarm reception.

Consider that there are few games for Linux and there were even fewer at that time. It probably is a bit of a hyperbole (and I don't think there is any problem with that), but I can see how someone would have their heart broken over that. Maybe they use only Linux normally, so it means they cannot even play?

No flamewar here. In this discussing a VIm cultist can agree with an Emacs brother. Better a good editor, than an IDE per language. I lose productivity when I try to use Eclipse simply because it doesn't have the same tools I already know from VIm, and it is not worth to me to learn it deeply, as I usually work combining different languages.

Why are changing ******* to *******?

Year of the linux destroyer?

So you believe in security through obscurity, right?

Parent has a certain point. Apple has no real obligation to pay. If one really wants a return, they should either charge for it, or maybe use a license that includes a return, e.g. GPLv2 with return of code. Unfortunately GPLv3 scared most serious users, Apple included.

African, of course. Didn't you read TFA? Oh, who I'm kidding, of course not.

Maybe the building is old enought to have been projected with power, but no one thought about the possibility of adding more cords?

Are you talking about the Return of the Kirk?

I don't know him, but I use usually git while colleagues would rather use mercurial, bazaar or fossil. Basically, any distributed version control system. I prefer git because it has more features and I want to learn how to best use them. Before that I used fossil because it was simple and all data was stored in a single file (SQLite database), but some small annoyances and bug drove me off. Bazaar I used a bit after inheriting a project, but it lacked features to me, mostly easy branching. Mercurial I have never used.

I think you mean ed.