I noticed that a bit laet to trun bakc.

Unacceptable! It must be WTF5138008, if it is to be anything!
Although I suppose WTFZ80 might work as well.

I thought the Free Software Foundation was that commie-pinko organization, bent on destroying the reputation of many beloved establishments which we hold near and dear to our hearts (Microsoft and Apple to name a couple. Hang in there boys! McCarthy will rise again!), thus crumbling one of the established cornerstones of Capitalism?
USA! USA!
Under Steves (Ballmer/Jobs) America!
In Soviet Russia, GNU -IS- Unix!

---

Given the news, I've been reading a little more about Mandelbrot than I should, but that blew my mind!

Knife would take too long to learn how to do correctly. Remember, the goal is only worms. Poking a hole in the security layer only invites other forms of malware to intrude. The plugin needs to make use of an already available connector or API (Aperture Pervasion Interface).

Is there a plugin for this?

I did.
I stand by my aspirations (by all definitions. You can look 'em up in your Funk and Wagnalls.).

that gives worms to ex-girlfriends.

This thread is a stroke of genius!

I don't care how crappy the movie was!

It should be noted that the "study" was conducted by the advertising network Chitika (quoted, because the mentioned "study" was probably just running AWStats or Webalizer against Chitika's own access logs). The unfortunate problem with this is that most, if not all modern browsers have the ability to utilize ad blocking solutions. When an ad is blocked, I belive that usually means your browser isn't even requesting the ad. You won't show up in their access logs. Browser-based analysis will be skewed.

That being said, my assumptions about ad blocker proliferation may be overly ambitious.

Yet another example of how life imitates Douglas Adams.

I cannot believe that I'm the first to post about hot cute the cover is. At least anyone will have to agree that the subjects would make for interesting sushi.

Let me post this disclaimer that I am as Democrat as they come. I somehow don't see the difference between this and depicting George W. as a chimp. Must be the whole "race" thing, or something. C'mon people! Stop feeding the flames! If you're going to put this kind of energy into something so trivial as a human-less web image search aggregator, you're only going to make it worse. The Google juggernaut is only doing it's job, which is to crawl the web, and give you, based on mathematic algorithms, what -it- deems to be the most relevant results. Racism is a human condition, not a mathematical model. Google even tried to fix it, but the humans figured a way around it. Incidently, do a Google Image search for "George Bush". I guarantee that you will see at least one comparing him to a chimp. I never heard someone put up a stink about Google displaying these on the first result page.

Yeah, um, show us some photos! While you're at it, I wanna see Unnilquadium too! And if ya' got some time, how about some unobtainium?