Submission + - The Quiet Revolution of Formula E Electric Car Racing (wsj.com) 1
But what if there is no sound at all?
Welcome to the quiet world of Formula E, a global racing series for electric cars, which debuts this month in Beijing.
So you're saying the non-smartass actually helpful answer is 'yes'?
It's not the first time they've done this "we know best" thing, unfortunately. There are cases involving HTTPS/HSTS where Firefox literally will not let you view a page it has decided is insecure, even if you explicitly want to ignore whatever the security problem is (for example, because it's a site you work on, and it's in active development and currently not fully configured).
Security warnings when encountering a likely threat = good. Overriding the user's explicit wishes = bad, always.
This isn't firefox specific, any software be it open or proprietary works the same way - the engineers must be able to recreate the problem themselves in order to fix it. There is no other option.
But there is another option for the users: they can use other software.
I sympathise with the frustrations of software developers, but the idea that any normal user (most of whom aren't going to be programmers or sysadmins themselves) is going to set up a virtual machine, reduce a bug they see down to a minimal test case, and then file a detailed bug report is crazy. It just isn't going to happen.
If a project has to keep relying on this, instead of being able to do good quality control and testing itself, the inevitable result is perpetually beta quality software, and getting left behind by other projects that are capable of doing proper quality control and testing.
It boggles the mind that you can say "dick all would have happened (and that's mostly what did happen" regarding Fukushima. It's clear that the vast majority of the population of japan do not agree with you.
Nuclear can do no wrong in your eyes. Are you aware that Fukushima is leaking at least 400 tonnes of highly radioactive water every day and it could be over 1000 tonnes a day, the ice wall the tried failed.
If wind costs 3c per kWh and nuclear costs 10c per kwh, what is the cost difference for 1GW of generation over 40 years? Answer over $24 billion. So how much storage could be built for $24 billion? Enough to store enough to produce 1GW for quite a long time I'd bet.
(3c for wind because current PPAs are averaging 2.5c and the subsidy is 2.2c for the first ten years)
If Hoover dam was built as pumped hydro, could they not install 5x as many turbines... or 10x or 20x or 100x? What would the capacity be? (It initially cost $1 billion taking inflation into account.)
Hoover dam capacity: 352,000km3
Dinorwig capacity is only 0.007km3 but is still useful as a 1.8GW pumped hydro station (which is profitable)
We haven't even started to store energy on a large scale because we cheat by digging a very finite amount of fossil and nuclear fuels out of the ground. I think stored energy could match renewables and still produce cheaper electricity in the long run.
They don't. If they did, they'd have already threatened Russia with them to make them stop. That's the point of having nuclear weapons, after all.
Ukraine foolishly believed that the US and Europe would protect them when they agreed to give up their nuclear weapons after the end of the Cold War. They're paying for that mistake now. If Ukraine survives but doesn't get to become a member of NATO, expect a full force nuclear weapons program on their part (which shouldn't be too hard, they have lots of nuclear power plants, lots of spent waste full of plutonium, and are the world's #9 uranium producer).
You should submit a patch. I'm sure the systemd guys will love it.
Only init itself has to run as pid1. Everything else that systemd does including startup could be done when called by init.
Does systemctl have a -f mode? That is, it outputs anything appended to the file as it happens?
Hey, don't call him a dictator. He was legitimately elected! People in the country love him to death. For example, he got 99.89% of the vote with a 99.59% turnout in Chechnya, which is obviously totally legit! In some parts of Grozny, as many as 107% of voters turned out to vote for the "Butcher of Grozny".
Totally legit!
My favorite was when he "found ancient pottery" right by the shore of a heavily trafficked beach. That even beats when he "singlehandedly saved a TV crew from a tiger attack"
The Jim Jong Un/Il stuff is a serious comparison. He doesn't take it as extreme, and Russia is only "way, way down" on the list of global press freedom rather than "at the very bottom". But it's along the same "Great Leader" lines.
I think some people way overestimate him and others way underestimate him. I think he's a human which in some ways has been very strategic and very short sighted. He's a hardcore nationalist and idealist, and is willing to take huge risks toward those goals. But he's also playing a very high stakes game that he could well lose. And I see little evidence that his actions in Ukraine have been anything more than winging it; Russia seems to have been repeatedly caught off guard by many of the events on the ground, including the low local collaboration rate, the willingness of the Ukrainian military to engage in military ops in populated areas, the inabilitity of the small Russian forces and local collaborators to hold ground, the amount of resources needed to successfully resist Ukraine, and whether the EU and US would dare risk Russian anger in terms of punishing Russia or helping Ukraine. In each case, Russia has had to hastily assemble counteraction.
When Yanukovitch fled, Ukraine's military was by all standards broken, the public had no stomach for fighting in their own territory, Russia was still more thought of as a partner than an enemy, joining NATO was a minority position in Ukraine, the EU and US were afraid of doing anything that could antagonize Russia, and so forth. Now Ukraine has been shifting their economy into a war economy, their forces are now veterans (still underarmed, but that could change rapidly), the public by and large fully supports the military action, Russia is by and large hated, joining NATO is a strong majority position, the EU and US have taken direct action against Russia and look ready to accelerate it, and so forth.
So let's say that - as it looks increasingly likely to happen - the US and EU arm Ukraine. Not just a little but, but fully commit to it - tanks, warplanes, antiaircraft, ships, subs, tactical missiles, the works, plus full realtime intelligence data sharing. What's Russia's next play? Ukraine, given enough modern US and EU equipment, could most likely defeat anything but total war with Russia. It's extremely doubtful the Russian public would have the stomach to do what would be necessary to take on and defeat a western-armed Ukraine using conventional weapons. So... nuclear weapons? They could, of course. But they'd instantly become a global paraiah, there'd be so much pressure against them that I don't think even China would leave their doors open to Russian trade anymore. Most Europeans would rather burn trash to heat their homes than pay for a wisp of gas from a nation that's actively using nuclear weapons on an aligned state (and realistically the loss of Russian gas wouldn't actually be that devastating, but it'd take too long to go into why). Not to mention what would happen in terms of internal terrorism/guerilla warfare within Russia, which is already a huge problem among Russia's many ticked off populations, and you can add tens of millions of recently-nuked Ukranians to that list, with pretty much unlimited funding for their actions provided by the US and EU. And Russia is a petroeconomy. Its manufacturing sector is grossly undersized compared to its population, even worse than during Soviet times. There's every reason to think that a fully embargoed Russia would collapse even worse than the USSR.
Putin doesn't want to use nukes, of course. He wants to threaten to use nukes. He wants Ukraine to think that he's actually crazy enough to do it so that they'll drop all future claims on Crimea and turn the eastern portion of their country to be a "federated" (Russian puppet) zone. And you know.... it is a possibility. Raise the fear level enough and people might just give in to the unthinkable.
It's an incredibly high stakes game he's playing, however, with a far from certain outcome.
For comparison, the USA is #1, Germany, France and the UK are 6-8. Now, if you're the worlds second-largest economy, would you prefer to have the worlds eighth-largest economy as a trading partner, or the world first, third, fourth, fifth and sixth? Now, if rational choices aren't enough, keep in mind that (in the scenario under discussion), the current President of #8 is someone who fondly recalls the days when you were a junior partner in an alliance and has demonstrated a willingness to use nuclear weapons.
And did you hear, rvz.ru/~vladimir/bullshit.html is reporting that Ukraine is now working with ALIENS and THE ILLUMINATI to force Russian mothers in the Donbass to eat their own babies! It's TRUE!
Freedom House on press freedom in Russia. Reporters Without Borders's take.
It's one thing if you're dumb enough to take state propaganda outlets of a country that takes #148th place on the press freedom ranking, where even blogs are forced to register with government censors if they get too many readers and where it's standard practice to hire actors to play parts in the news. But it's even more ridiculous when you do so in regards to an event where said propaganda outlets have put forth literally more than a dozen different, completely contradictory reasons why it's not Russia's fault, including but not limited to "we have proof Ukraine shot it down with a surface-to-air missle", "we have proof Ukraine shot it down with an air-to-air missile", "we have proof that Ukraine gunned it down with a fighter cannon", "we have proof that Ukraine rammed it", "we have proof that Ukraine loaded a plane full of dead bodies, disguised it as a civilian airliner and tricked the rebels into shooting it down", "we have proof that Ukraine deliberately tricked the rebels into shooting down an actual civilian airliner", and my favorite - the original reported in the Russian press, before it became clear that it was a civilian aircraft - "we've confirmed that the heroic rebels of the Donbas just successfully shot down a Ukranian military jet!"
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion