TLS is not an encryption algorithm, it's a protocol which uses encryption algorithms. TLS is not vulnerable to quantum computers. Some of the encryption algorithms used by TLS (each of which has its own name) are potentially vulnerable.
It's called an "inverter" air conditioner. It produces a variable-frequency AC sine wave from the DC voltage. The variable-frequency to the compressor changes the cooling output, so instead of turning the air conditioner on and off as the temperature wanders back and forth across the set point, it varies the frequency to keep the temperature steady.
http://www.acson-international...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It is brilliant.
Sharp already sells these air conditioners. They're just removing the DC rectifier circuit and running directly on DC instead of starting with 50hz or 60hz AC.
High AC voltages have induction losses. They don't travel as well as low voltages.
BUT
The goal is to send lots of watts, not lots of amps or volts. Low amperages travel well. High amperages don't travel at all -- they lose most of their energy to heat. Simple transformers (which are basically just coils of wire) can swap amps for volts so that lots of watts can travel a long distance at low amperages.
Basically, Sharp is eliminating the rectifier circuit from one of their existing products. Sharp currently sells it as an 'Inverter Air Conditioner".
Unlike most air conditioners, inverter air conditioners are always-on. The inverter varies the -frequency- of alternating current sine wave in order to change the cooling output of the air conditioner. It continuously outputs just enough cooling to maintain a steady temperature in the room.
To do this, the A/C converts the incoming wall power to DC and then back to variable frequency AC. Eliminating the initial AC to DC conversion here makes good sense.
He'll plead to negligent discharge of a firearm. Shooting into the air in a suburban neighborhood is dangerous. When you miss, the bullet comes back down somewhere, possibly at speed.
This is a loser of a case. If the annotations are official legal guidance of the state of Georgia then it's not copyrightable. If they're a third-party creation owned by a third party then Georgia has no standing to bring suit. That's for the third-party to do.
Sounds like they're playing fast and loose with the rules.
You misunderstand. Security isn't cow sh** it's bullsh**.
Even better, move all applications to the web, so everything runs on central servers which are much easier to manage and secure than a fleet of personal computers. Give users Chromebooks or another thin client configuration and don't let them install software.
This is presumptuous. You're a security guy. You don't know enough about the myriad and varied work the company's employees do to make birght-line rules about how they must do it. Nor will you with any amount of training.
> All of those things are worthless with a user base that does not respect and actively subverts security.
Framing the situation that way is a mindset that guarantees catastrophic security failure.
Hear hear! The user base doesn't actively subvert security unless security is obtrusive and overbearing. Subverting security is too much effort.
Where are your test systems and test cases?
Seriously?
The truth is, if you are a [life form of any kind], and someone threatens to murder you online, it's overwhelmingly likely that no help is coming, and you're on your own.
There, I fixed it for you.
Clearly a job for openvpn. Split tunnel when you don't want to control Internet access. No split tunnel when you do.
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"
