I have been working in the IT/Telecom/Wireless areana for 15 years now, and everytime one of those Sprint 4G adds come on, my blood really begins to boil - my wife doesn't understand why this gets me angry (she is not technical at all). I wish that people/companies/marketing would get the fact that there are standards and "bending the truth" does actually do harm. Language means something, standards mean something.

Computer Thief Barred From Using Handlebars

There was a company in the United states that tried rear mounted turbine engines for power mayber 10 years ago - the company was called Rosin motors (or something like that) - they developed increadible power and gas mileage for the time - their only problem was rear impact testing. If a sufficient enough rear impact happened, then all those "spinning blades" in the turbine became hurling blades - because of this, they never produced a streetable car. They tried many techniques to fix this, but any time they had a concept that would contain the turbines, it was too heavy and the gas mileage was degraded to much. I wounder how Jaguar has gotten around this

based on what Adams said: "The writer Douglas Adams observed how technology that existed when we were born seems normal, anything that is developed before we turn 35 is exciting, and whatever comes after that is treated with suspicion" I have to be suspicious of everything I develop now that I am older that 35

I am so tired of this "too big to fail" argument. Capitalism works folks...as long as the socio-economic goons in politics stay out of the way. There is no company to big to fail. If some Car manufacturer or large banks or even Google where allowed to fail, it may sting for a while, but there would be many other entities out there ready and willing to pick up the pieces and march forward (and not cost the taxpayer any money). Allowing such a failure might also wake some large corporate entities up and make them rethink their practices.

I understand the martyr reference, but this is pure self preservation...My team works in a large corporate environment, and while groups all around us are being cut (and we end up taking on the extra work), we still have jobs, and the fact that our team is the one management continues to come to, shows at least some amount of faith in us. We have a fantastic team and we are all willing to go the extra mile to stay in tact. Most of the technical people on the team are hourly contractors, so the extra cash helps.

Our development time is estimated based on when management has promised a feature/enhancement. Even when management has forgotten to tell the development team the promised date, until a few days beforehand. Apparently this is a very accurate way to estimate programming/testing time, because somehow we always make the dates. Of course there are times when sleep is not accounted for in these estimates.