It depends on how you would define child porn. Some would argue that having small breasts makes you a child.

The minimum wage is set to prevent exploitation of workers. A maximum wage should be set because they don't contribute enough(in your opinion)? And you didn't answer my other questions...

Doug Suttles later stated that BP is hard at work to come up with even cooler names for their next failed attempts to stop the oil leak. When questioned about their competence to do the job, he was quoted saying "we're stuck between overkill and final death."

Yeah, what a reliable source for the study--- an internet survey. America does produce lots of crappy beer, but we also produce some of the best beer. It's simple economics. The crap beer is cheap and more in demand.

If they aren't contributing, why are they being paid? What gives the government the right to tell someone that their labor has a set value? If private companies are paying them, that's fine. If a crime is being committed, they should be prosecuted. But if they get paid more than you think they should be paid, how does this justify their salaries being capped?

When I was younger, I loved movies. I pirated them quite frequently and rarely paid for them. I occasionally went to movies, but normally I didn't pay. As I am growing older, the money I am spending on media is increasing. I go to the movies a lot more, rent more, and pay for Rhapsody and other services. Should I have simply not watched movies when I was younger? Perhaps it was immoral to pirate them. Even so, I did not have the money; now that I do I pay.

If they are losing money and getting bonuses, who is at fault? Them, or the people paying them?

Why do you hate the rich? Americans deserve a certain standard of living and opportunities, but why should we punish those who succeed?

While the divide between the classes is large, it's a joke to claim that the majority is poor. Most Americans are above the poverty line and live well. Very few people are actually "poor."

That doesn't really apply in a civil case.

Now the Navy is doing Dance Dance Revolution for Boot Camp? Have they not been hearing the jokes about themselves?

Word is that 127.0.0.1 was the first to be sued.

I didn't think it was that good of a movie. The critics (from what I've heard) raved about it, but I found the combat scenes to be unrealistic, the dialogue to be rather boring, and the plot uninteresting. One ridiculous scene involved a gun jammed because there was blood on the bullet. Seriously? Using one of the best sniper rifles in the world and blood on the bullet jammed the gun? Of course removing the bullet and cleaning it with spit did the trick. Interestingly enough, all of this was done right next to where someone had just been shot. What a ridiculous scene. Maybe they didn't make that much money because it wasn't that good of a movie... Also, Avatar was in the theaters at the same time and everyone was talking about that. Either way, I bet they're just suing some Bit Torrent noobs and they won't accomplish anything. I hope that everyone fights the suits so we can see what happens when they take 5,000 people to court....

I've already submitted a patent for denim material that covers from several inches above the knees to the waist. A button will be used to hold the material together. I call this invention the "not-longs." I've checked and there is no prior art. I am waiting for my patent to be approved.