Prompting the user with wrong or irrelevant information also conditions to user to ignore the information, making the prompt useless for the times the information is actually relevant.

Aren't the commercial implications of such an advancement enticing enough to make the private sector throw many more millions, if not billions, into this research, if they haven't done so already? Granted, they would only allow new batteries to come to market if they lasted for fewer charge cycles.

All in preparation for next big thing after that... MORE accurate hardware! 6.24% more!

Like presumption of innocence, trial by jury, and habeas corpus.

It's Matrix money. It could only harm you to analyze it too deeply.

I can't fathom why an institution grounded in the scientific method couldn't scientifically develop an effective participant-moderated comment system.

There's rumors an LTE version will be announced soon.

But over an average of many observations, the path of a particle is seen to be able to be obstructed and prevent the interaction from occuring where it would have had there not been an obstruction, i.e. shadows cast by objects blocking light sources.

Also, radiation is proven to take time to traverse space, i.e. when communicating with a satellite.

This is a well known fact. Personal electronic gadgets can only distract, or make the learning process more efficient, reducing mnemonics that help retention.

http://www.youtube.com/user/freddiew He must be lined up for the death penalty then.

Nice to see that they seem to have planned ahead in the original physical specs.

Hey now, 5 billion transistors!

I don't see any control surfaces or retrothrusters, and rocket engine only has a single nozzle. How does it steer? Maybe an internal gyro?

Pst... it would still taste like meat.

We come back full circle to punch cards.