Comment Re:ASCII (Score 1) 110
I am talking about firefox updates.
I am talking about firefox updates.
> First time accepted submitter chimeraha (3594169)
Wayne?
just saying
Why? When canonical tries to make an own OS instead of a linux distro, they should not require others to do the work for them.
Why aren't you linking to the blogpost, instead of the article quoting the blogpost?
or adblock them. you can get an expression, which blocks the images, only on collapsed tweets
Yeah. I do not think its a problem with gender, nor a problem with games or kids.
Some games use violence as a game element, you are violent without even knowing the gender of other players.
And you should not let your kid play violent games until a certain age, when they need to decide this themselfes.
transparent updating is another issue. You grant a program the the right to install arbitrary binary code. And in case of firefox on windows, even with administrator rights (chrome gets it better with user privileges, but the interesting data is in your home anyway).
so, what are your alternatives?
- trust paths: good luck with the transitivity
- personal meetings: always the best choice, if your privacy is important
- trusting a central instance. Good luck chosing one.
I know several webinterfaces
on the other hand
then it's just too late. and how many people will actually remove a compromised CA from their CA list? like 0.1%?
Do you really know, he's the real one? he's handing out correct cards, nobody tempered with? Do you watch the cards all the time, so nobody could swap them, when you look away for a moment? You need to max out your paranoia.
its kind of a routing problem.
so you could do a two-step auth. look at your trust paths, ask yourself how much verification each person may have done to the next.
Or try to get shorter trust paths. And more.
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra