You were a safe driver for 11 years but not as safe as one like yourself but who does not listen to the radio. Going by the data you have provided us you have a 1 in 11 chance of an accident per year, ongoing too if you keep listening.

Personally, I have always removed my car radios. Not particularly to avoid distraction, but because the space makes a handy cubbyhole, gives thieves less reason to break in, and because I don't like announcers having verbal diarrhea in my car.

So no-one can ever be stopped from driving where you live? In the UK there are quite a few classes of people not allowed to drive. Children, people banned for the more serious traffic offences, the blind and poor sighted, and older people who fail the driving re-test they must take periodically. How they get around is their own problem. One solution is not to live somewhere they can only reach by driving a car. I live in a remote area and I accept that one day, when I get old, I might have to move into a city.

I have just followed your link, and it looks like it is free only for a 30 day trial.

Dan East wrote :-

What idiots modded this as "Informative"?

He seems to think that a nanoampere is a unit of energy. Then suddenly he converts " 2 nanoampere a second" to "nanoampere-hours" which in terms of dimensional analysis means he has somehow acquired a T (ie time) squared component from somewhere !

Different types differ, and you don't know what type of battery this one is.

Wrong. Even setting aside the fact that an auto transmission has less mechanical efficiency. The computer cannot see the road ahead, it generally bases its decisions on the present moment, which can be wrong. My car is auto and it often makes wrong decisions about what gear to be in (I often override it).

In recognition of this, some up-market cars have started using GPS positioning so that the transmission can anticipate hills and bends etc, but even that cannot anticipate a traffic situation ahead.

Might have something to do with the type of person who drives these cars. A kid who removes the baffles in his silencer (US "muffler"?) is probably the type who is more likely to have accidents than the type of driver attracted to a smooth, quiet car. An effect that might well outweigh the "safety" of a louder approach noise.

Yes, but don't you see? This is going to settle the argument once and for all. Who better to ask than the US Senate?

Not to mention the massive advances of the Industrial Revolution, continuing through the technical advances of the 19th and the first two-thirds of the 20th. Since then things have become pretty lame in the West, which now largely spends its time and money navel gazing, and wondering whether it is being politically correct enough. Which is why China and India are now getting ahead of the West, having no such distractions.

These things are to do with fashion. Currently, "diversity" is in fashion in the West, and whatever is in fashion is likely to attract brighter, younger people. If homogeneity were in fashion, that would attract brighter people. As a historical example, early medieval monasteries, about as homogeneous as communities could get (at the time) attracted the brightest young men. That is because they were in fashion at the time; and even if you did not want actually want to join one, you sponsored one if you were rich enough. The monks wanted to get away from the bustling, hedonistic, "vibrant", "diverse" society outside, which they saw as a world that would not last much longer, and was descending to Hell. Of couse, by the late middle ages many of the monks had become "diverse" and "vibrant" themselves, meaning that they had turned some monasteries into bawdy houses and drinking dens. One reason why Henry VIII could dissolve them.

The fashion for diversity might soon be over however, now that people are beginning to see how it works in practice, especially recently.

It would have been the best thing to happen if it had been a decent OS. DOS wasn't it, nor was Windows before NT/XP. It was meant to be Unix. Even Microsoft meant it to be Unix- that is why they wrote Xenix. DOS, the "Quick and Dirty Operating System they bought in to fulfil their IBM contract because they had nothing else ready, was meant as a stop gap. But when MS did finish writing Xenix for the PC they only pitched it at the corporate and academic market and left the peasants up to their necks in the crap that was DOS.

I would not describe the dog's breakfasts that were DOS and Win 3.x and Win9x/ME as a "Golden Age". I would say there was a first Golden Age with the non PC, non Microsoft micros in the 80's when there was a DOS equivalent in CP/M, used on higher end micros. Then there was a second Golden Age that corresponded with the life of XP.

And the PC age did not exactly explode. As late as 1990 for example the Amiga 3000 was introduced, running Unix and superior to its contemporary PCs. It took about ten years for PCs to oust other micros, and for some time PCs were used mainly in clerical and admin roles. For home, non-PC micros prevailed for a long time, and techies ot work (when we could still make our own buying decisions) tended to use Unix systems for heavy lifting or things like Amigas for smaller odd jobs. At least where I worked.

As it (or at least the interesting bit) lasted "the span of a millisecond", those other radio-telescope operators must have acted pretty quick.

That is absolutely barmy, barmy, barmy. How can anyone possibly be held responsible for paying for something they did not want and did not initiate? No wonder you get bombarded with calls.

Does the caller pay anything?

That is slightly misleading. Your link says :-

A survey ... found that those registered with the TPS did report a decrease in calls. But they still received an average of ten in the past month, compared with five for those who had not signed up.

In other words, people are more likely to sign up to the TPS if they are getting more calls in the first place. Not suprising. And then the calls they get are reduced. My experience with the TPS has been fairly good : calls certainly reduced. However, the TPS itself hardly seems to do anything (apart from keeping the list). I have complained about callers to them several times and never received any feedback. They say they issue fines of 1.5 million GBP last year -that's nothing.

That is the point isn't it? A non-homogeneous population is far more prone to these atrocities. The examples you give are where and when the population was not homogeneous. I could give many more too in the past (eg Saxons-Britons, Danes-Saxons), and they often started with someone (Tony Blair is a modern example) inviting a foreign people in because they thought they would lend power or money to their own elbow, an idea which then backfired. Such atrocities will occur even more in future with the trouble being stored up now.

I'm not sure what fear you are talking about. My reaction to this crap is anger, not fear, nor is fear a reaction I see in others I know. On the contrary, I want to kick those terrorists' arses. Looking at the Liveleak video I find myself wishing I was down there with a gun myself so I could have a shot at the bastards. I was in the military myself once, and it was not because of fear that I carried a gun at that time.

For me, the next best thing to kicking their arses myself is seeing someone else doing so, hence I am all for measures that will lead to that end. So let's post those cartoons everywhere now, to get the bastards to come out and show themselves.