I actually don't mind the deals at all.

That is how I think advertising should work, relevant, and discount.

Yeah, I know, but I hate those underline things.

That's why I stopped going to phoronix.com.

I hate the popover adds on my phone, at least the /. ones seem to close easily.

the blue underline ads are always terrible and useless, and I click them by accident when scrolling via touch, they really annoy me.

Apperently so. The new Slashdot.

I'm also getting those blue underlain word ads, and popover ads on my phone.

Between the people leaving, and this, I may be leaving myself.

I just haven't found exactly the right fit.

I'm pretty sure the cash discounts are about taxes. Places that have them usually have them well above the fees.

Large businesses have other ways to avoid taxes, so they don't need to preferentially accept cash.

I'm pretty sure they hate MasterCard gift cards too.

That's what I was thinking, reminds me of this:
http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id...

I always find it weird that somehow donations are looked at as being less influencing than ads.

You can get ads through a network where you have no communication with the buyers, and place them on the front page only (to make sure no ads show up near articles that may be controversial). The only possible influence is the ad network, so we can look for evidence of that as the public.

Clearly mark the ad, and it should all be fine.

I don't see how a large donation is any less prone to influence than an advertiser.

I suspect that in at least some jurisdictions this will fall into a close enough to taxi to be taxi category.

Similar to how Aero lost the lawsuit where it was determined that they were functionally a cable company, not a rental of equipment (which is what they were technically).

Which has absolutely nothing to do with my questioning that active THC remains in the body with a similar pattern to its matabolized parts.

I have no idea the reasonableness of the limits set, but it does look like they are talking about people that currently have THC in them, and are actively trying to test that, unlike employers.

I would think that active THC by definition makes you high. If it doesn't have effect it's inactive.

Is that true for active THC?

I know it is for the matabolized leftovers, but never heard this to be the case for THC.

Really? Reports about le mans when audi won with a diesel engine a few years back said that the winning car was quite enough that if it was driving through a neighborhood nobody would call the police.

Uber cars can't be flagged down, I think that's the distinction they are relying on.

Considering everyone I'm referencing has a Masters or PhD, that's not the problem I was referencing.

I have highly educated friends that are getting kicked out of the country after losing the H1-B lotto, I don't think it's an issue with not being able to attract people.