Im going to respond to this, and then drop myself from this thread. We can have our own flame war elsewhere. I think we both see the world so differently that we're not going to convince each other of much, and we'll bore the slashdot readers that are not us.
You say you don't want quotas and then you talk about what is and is not a good mix.
Not a contradiction. We're arguing different semantics here. Quota, as usually used in diversity, is a required number, a required percentage. We both agree that a required number is bad. I argue that you still must have metrics. Just as anything at your work, you need to see current status and are to be able to make adjustments. You differ on this part, which is fine, but I have no contradiction. if you want to argue that the definition of "quota" is does not, as commonly used, have a requirement, it's just a percentage measurement, then fine, but my argument is the same, with different words.
I am not my race or my sex.
You are not SOLELY your race or gender. I agree with that. But part of your personality is defined by that. Not 100%, and the percentage differs from individual to individual. But it does define a part of you. Your personality is based on those experiences you find so marvelous in yourself. Those experiences have as part other people in them. In this world, how people act towards you is defined by your race and gender. This is baked into humans, as we see chimps make clans and war and all that. We too make clans, sometimes based on race and gender. To argue otherwise, i feel, is a bit naive. A big part of how the world acts towards you is race and gender. A big part of your personality is therefore based on race and gender. Not all, but a chunk.
If you have a room full of people who have a myriad of qualities but all have the same "white male" qualities, then there is a huge part missing, because no one will have the parts that are black, or female. There's a hole there. You may not think the hole is important, that's fine. but others do. And you're arguing that hole doesn't exist, which i think is an error.
If you filled a room with white guys you are very unlikely to have even ONE guy like me.
As said before in both my grandparent post, and above, this is both true and irrelevant. You will have some common white male characteristics, to a varying degree with each man there, but none will have the black or Asian or female characteristics. We are trying to capture those missing experiences. That you have additional very cool features is good for some level of diversity, but not the types of experiences we're talking about.
I am no more my race then I am my height.
Ask a little person if height doesn't affect things. hard to drive a car, hard to shop, people act differently towards you. How people act towards you affects your personality. Ask a guy 6'8" on how to design airline seats. Your experiences help you design a world that fit more of us than one with just guys of normal height.
Race and gender are moronic ways to classify people.
True, but it's what humans do. If you want to solve real world problems you have to consider what humans actually do in this world, which means the moronic reaction to race and gender. In the US (which I'm assuming you're from for some reason) race is also tied tightly to socioeconomic stratum.
Race is totally meaningless
Tell that to Trayvon Martin's parents. Or the people of Ferguson Missouri. See above for what I believe should happen (race is meaningless) vs what has happened (Rodney King, poll tax, etc).
I've Bloviated way too long and beginning to wear out my welcome. Please read Bomb the Suburbs by William "Upski" Wimsatt if you can. It's about a white boy who at one point thought pretty much as you did, but then realizing that being a white guy gave him a tailwind that helped him over the years.