Comment Re:How to tell (Score 1) 639
I'm using my phone to reply, please excuse the words switched by predictive text.
I'm using my phone to reply, please excuse the words switched by predictive text.
I've thought about my political views quite a bit compared to most, but then I class myself as a political activist and campaigner. The most useful thing that test did for me us show me that the main political parties in the UK are as far away from my beliefs as they can get. Even the Liberal Democrats, who I used to be a member of, are the other end of the scale from me economically even though they are three same as me on the other scale.
Actually the first four questions cover political beliefs of quite a few people. You say they have nothing to do with your political beliefs if you are a reasonable person. Have you considered that some people disagree with you and the test needs to find out who those people are?
I seem to be a bit more extreme - Economic Left/Right: -7.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.77!
The Political Compass is a really useful guide to political left-right but works out your position on both an economic scale (left-right) and a social scale. (Authoritarian-libertarian.) It does seem a little biased towards the left-wing but I think much of that is people having different views to the views they think they have.
And I should add that H&M and Looklet do have male examples in their virtual dressing room too.
Why does everyone assume that this is all about keeping the costs down by not hiring models? H&M use computer-generated images because they allow customers to mix and match their clothes in a virtual dressing room. Most pictures have a "Try on" link underneath them. All the clothes still have to be photographed, and they still photograph actual models. The images have to be processed and prepared, so it isn't much cheaper than a regular photoshoot. H&M are using Looklet to do all of that, and other shops use them too. H&M never hid these facts or claimed that the photos were all real models either, there's no scandal here.
If we eventually use Bitcoin in everyday life, say, in the supermarket, how will we deal with prices in fractions of a Bitcoin? What terminology might we use for something priced at 0.00000005 Bitcoins?
I wrote about a similar problem a few days ago. Facebook and Twitter are the only contact I have with some people, yet they are private businesses with no obligation to provide a service, and they can and do close accounts on a whim.
Here's my blog post about it. The fragility of social networks
I think you have a good point there. In trying to place extra restrictions and obligations on free software GPL3 will actually reduce the usage of said software. It's the coders choice, of course, but I think GPL3 is a bad choice.
Not so; but rebooting would have to include zeroing all of the memory. Starting up and resuming with the contents intact would be more akin to coming out of sleep mode.
I'm afraid your understanding is wrong. You must have a license if you watch or record TV (or internet TV) as it is broadcast. It is not related to owning a TV receiver, although if you purchase a TV your details will be sent to the thugs at TV licensing who will send you menacing letters if you don't have a license.
The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.