sounds familiar somehow.....Thor perhaps?

oh right.....yeah....that'd be a whole bunch of you guys......

oh well, I hope that bed you made is lovely and warm!!

dude, what would convince you, they found her head in his glove box? I mean....seriously? or are you being ironic perhaps...no smiley face...so I'm going to go with serious....

I mean, who wouldnt want to record londons electrical power signatures..Sounds like the first thing I'd want to do when I got home....o.O.....seriously??

I'm not 100% sure whether you're just trolling or being serious....

bwwawaaaahahhahahha, you sir made my day.....

no, thats step 3, everybody knows that!!!! (hehe)

ok, at least you're honest about it, but holy shit, really, 50 tabs? you really need that much porn open at once.....you must be like a rabid sex monkey 23 hours a day....

time = money, so implicity, you are paying, you are using your time to keep accepting the same old shit everytime, such as, how many years do you think it'll take for debian to correct all it's broken package dependencies?

uninstall alsa, uninstall my gnome desktop, you are fucking kidding me right?

some of the package maintainers are idiots....
also, libtool? what a fucking joke.....autotools? ask ESR what he thinks (http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1877)

linux is like an operating system for the laziest programmers on the planet apart from the kernel devs, do as little work as possible because doing it right would take too long and then they wouldnt have free time to go back to programming wobbly windows....which apparently is cool

second step......

how is it horribly misguided, when you're one example proves his point.

that you cannot optimise the ASM layer, cause it's already directly on the cpu, but you can optimise the algorithm.

your example did just that and this optimisation is done FAR FAR above the assembly level.

dear sir, you have a very short memory, that is all.

that opengl problem doesn't seem to affect ATI though, so I guess it shouldn't affect nvidia also?

or have I missed something?

oops, meant "Not proud of it" before any grammer nazis find it :)

really?? you have engineers working for you? are you sure they're engineers? cause I've never ever heard of a programmer call himself an engineer other than those who want to glorify what they do, which is type code into a terminal and HOPE it doesn't crash without even as much as a couple of page refreshes in their favourite browser or executions and the barest amount of testing known to man.

I'm one of those people and I certainly DON'T call myself an engineer. Now proud of it, but the tools we have are too immature and I'm improving my situation as I go along.