"what if you had data on there you didn't want
unauthorized people to see?"

That's the wrong question..

"What if you had sensitive data on their that you are contractually required to restrict access to?"

I certainly wouldn't expect datacenter company to root a box. Unilaterally turning it off if it is causing problem, sure, but that isn't accessing the data.

Your analogy is off. It's more like there is a pothole in your driveway, and your concrete contractor asks for your keys to make sure that it isn't your wheels.

I'll second this. If you didn't agree to them having root access in the contract, they are illegally accessing your hardware, which is a felony. You may just want to notify the FBI, as well as your and their state's attorneys general.

Why do you think they tell you to go buy a new, shiny one. Oh, and put lots of hd space in it too, they need to store their porn collection.

Right, but in this instance the police acted appropriately... They were alerted to a potential threat, contained it, discovered it wasn't a threat at all and left. No charges were filed, and a suggestion was given that would result in a whole lot of police and Bungie staff not having their time wasted.

To the guy that said carrying the gun was political speech. Bullshit. In this instance, an employee was carrying a piece of equipment from point a to point b. That equipment just happened to be something that the general public took as a threat. The police suggested a way to alleviate time wasted in the future.

If they were to actually carry this item as political speech, it would be wise to alert the police that you are doing so _before_ you start marching around with a fake gun. Otherwise, you are _very_ likely to be looking down the barrel of a very real gun.

So you are saying that they're happy to get their return of investment on their hardware alone in 44 years? I doubt it.

On a similar note, they claim that they will backup any one computer for $5/month. Well, my one computer happens to be the backup node for my SAN, so they're going to need about 15 TB (It's a small SAN) to have 30 day backups for me. Please note, that all of the files on my SAN are under 4GB and I have a SAN, not a NAS, so my servers see it as a native hard drive.

Or it could be that the Palm Sync was largely PPC code running in emulation on intel machines, and the cost of porting it to intel was not in the interest of Apple, given all of the other work they had to do with making the entire OS x86 compatible, plus the availability of a better product (The Missing Sync), plus the fact that the manufacturer no longer supports the OS.

Nah, you're right. It's all about Steve, and the fact that he would rather you get an iPhone, rather than an aged device with an ancient OS. Which is a valid reason for a business as well.

Not in nine months.

That's because they're in the red light section of the state fair. Have you shown proof of age anywhere yet? Then you can't see any sheep.

At least you can verify that it still is in the evidence locker, using MobileMe.

No one's thinking about the other part of the puzzle. The iranian government is free to use these proxies for whatever evil they want to strike up. Your proxy for a free Iran may just be the conduit for an attempt to hack into the pentagon, and you aren't any more the wiser.

I support the people of Iran accessing the internet (as well as all humans) and communicating. I support those that know how to properly setup a nicely sandboxed proxy with access going to only facebook and twitter. However, if you don't know what you are doing, you can help whatever enemy you perceive you are fighting against, as well as get yourself in a whole lot of trouble.

Remember, you are essentially becoming a combatant in what is looking like a foreign civil war. Do you really understand the battle?

The President has not said nothing...

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-President-on-Iran-The-World-is-Watching/
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-President-Meets-with-Prime-Minister-Berlusconi-Comments-on-Iran/

He is basically saying that if the US gets involved it no longer becomes about the Iranian people. And he is right.

My users usually tell me they download it to the server.

But this is reasonable. The user is telling the technician what they are experiencing, and expecting that the technician is expected to translate the symptom into what is wrong.

However, when it comes to computers, they are making a judgement of what the problem is, usually with incorrect vocabulary that tells you exactly their ability.

Please people, don't correct anyone on "The hard drive." It's not that big of deal, and it is a good canary for telling you how much you should listen to them.