And what is wrong with that. I could really do with the politician doing even LESS. I like this minority government because it does NOTHING. The economy is doing very well, there is no real pressing problems and all is good. Keep doing nothing the last thing I want is an activist government. The difficulty is getting the right balance to achieve a minority government but we Canadian are getting good at it.

Actually the chain of trust is the issue, there is no way to insure that chain if you let the user install any software on the unit. Just talk to all those people trying to enforce DRM... If you jailbreak a unit then there is no way you can guarantee the chain of trust, or at least it become so murky that for all non security experts it becomes very difficult to judge what is the valid chain of trust and what is the compromised one.

There is a value in a well trusted device.

This is a lie from Adobe. Translation it does not work the same way on Linux and MacOS than on Windows and we cannot be bothered to write the code for it. If you don't make the effort why should Apple do it for you?

I really like that term technical violation of the law. So if I am over the speed limit I am in technical violation of the speed limit and I should not get a ticket , just a mention in the newspaper. Try that defense next time...

You should look harder: http://www.apple.com/appletv/

Why do you say that a jailbroken phone is illegal? The device is yours you bought it. As far as I know Apple only says that it voids the warranty not that their users are criminals...

Jailbreaking is not breaking copy restriction, at least not directly. Some people may use it for that purpose but most of them don't. In my experience iPhones are jailbroken to be unlocked. All of the jailbroken iPhone that I know of only run UltraSn0w and are not vulnerable. All of those people buy software at teh App store because it is more convenient and their iPhone is as stable as any other iPhone. After all what do you do with a second hand iPhone?

And why is the sacrifice good? Except for some extreme religious folks, most people would rather enjoy life. Presenting environment consciousness as a sacrifice may be a good way to start the environment religion but I would be surprised if this message ever gain mainstream acceptance. Finding sustainable solution that enables us to maintain our way of life is probably a better message.From everything I have read there maintaining a good and easy life while keeping the planet cool are not incompatible goals. I don't see what the "sacrifice" has to do with good engineering.

Actually we should even encourage this by giving a tax discount on the first 15 liters of fuel you pump. If you are driving a Hummer this would make very little difference you will not go anywhere with 15 liters but if you are running a Smart that is 1 week worth of travel...

This would really encourage light weight fuel efficient vehicle.

What is your point there? That Apple does a few things very well and Microsoft a lot poorly? Since when has bloat been a valid excuse for poor design?

I find that discussion very entertaining but very unscientific. What is the margin of error of the various measurements? How are the categories defined and what are the margin of error in that definition and the classification of the individuals? With the number presented there is nothing to disprove the statement that "All people informed about nuclear technologies are in favor of its use". You just have to measure the error and find that it is 10% which would not be uncommon in that type of general measurement.

I have 4 sim cards in my wallet (ATT, Fido, Vodafone(AU) and SFR) and I change them whenever I need to. No reboot, No iTunes. Just switch wait a few seconds for the network discovery and off you go. It even reconfigures the phone features on the fly, letting you send MMS in Canada but not in the US.

Except at the border.US custom officer have the right to search you, your luggage and your hard drive without cause. They also have the right to demand that you decrypt your information.

Actually XP and IE6 run very well on my virtual partition on MacOSX. With the coherence mode it is really easy to go from one to the other. You should try it.

You are missing the point. Developers wants their cake and eat it. they want both a cheap way of distributing their apps with low level of piracy and complete freedom to publish whatever they want whenever they want. This is just not compatible.

The truth is that the App Store is a success for the developers and the users because of the abundance of relatively inexpensive applications, typically they are less than half their price on PCs. The main reason is that piracy is very low, but that also mean that someone has to administer the system. Yes the approval process can be improved but it will not disappear as Apple has to take responsibility for the distribution and integrity of the platform. That may be a break for rapid turn around but it is the condition for a functioning market. If you like a comparison the stock exchange can only operate successfully because of the SEC. It may be that in the long term there will be a separation of the approval / regulation process and the retail operation but we are not there yet.