Also, international law in the form of signed treaties are law in the US, per the Constitution.
Treaties require a 2/3 vote by the Senate in the US Constitution. This vote creates a local law. The Senate can repeal that law. So like I said. International law only exists if the participating countries enforce it with local laws. The closest thing to international law in the United States are rights. Under American legal philosophy these rights are not created by the Constitution. Rather they are given to man by God or are self evident human rights. Thus privacy, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, our God given rights. They apply to non citizens because God gave those rights to all people.
above.. international law
All national goverments are above international law. International law only exists if a participating country enforces it with a local law.
but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Presumably this is about searching with a warrent.
But at no point does Mr. Gobry actually rant about any of them
I said the summary is a rant. I did not read the linked article. The quote appear to have been cut up quite a bit. Notice all the
The worst thing I am reading in these comments is basically "I don't understand the summary".
Insult Insult Insult. No reasonable argument here.
Jaroslav Flegr, Jan Havlíek and Jitka Hanuova-Lindova, and to David Hanauer, Naren Ramakrishnan, Lisa Seyfried, for investigating whether it is mentally hazardous for a human being to own a cat.
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai